Coca-Cola Responds to Trump’s Cane Sugar Deal Claim, Defends Corn Syrup
On July 16, 2025, Donald Trump stirred attention by urging Coca-Cola to replace high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar in its U.S. drinks. He called corn syrup “garbage” and claimed that a new deal with sugar producers is in the works. That grabbed attention fast. After all, Coca-Cola is one of the world’s most famous brands, and its sweetener choice affects millions of bottles every day.
Now, Coca-Cola is speaking up. The company says its use of corn syrup is safe, efficient, and rooted in U.S. trade rules. This isn’t just about sugar. It’s about science, economics, and supply chains. In this article, we’ll unpack what Trump said, how Coca-Cola responded, and why this matters for food production in America.
Trump’s Cane‑Sugar Proposal: What Was Said?
Trump shared on Truth Social that he’s been in talks with Coca-Cola about bringing back real cane sugar in U.S. Coke, and claimed they agreed. He thanked company leaders and predicted it would be “just better.”
His message aligned with the “Make America Healthy Again” campaign led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has criticized HFCS for its link to obesity and diabetes. Trump framed cane sugar as healthier and more American, fed by nostalgia and a populist push for familiar ingredients.
Coca‑Cola’s Official Response
Coca‑Cola responded diplomatically at first, thanking Trump for his “enthusiasm” and hinting at “new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range.”
Later, they struck a firmer tone, defending HFCS:
- High-fructose corn syrup is considered safe and contains roughly the same calories per serving as regular sugar, with a similar digestion process.
- The American Medical Association states that high-fructose corn syrup is no more likely to cause obesity than regular sugar. Coca-Cola stressed that its beverages are free from any harmful ingredients.
Science Behind Corn Syrup vs. Cane Sugar
Chemically, HFCS and sucrose (cane sugar) are nearly identical. High-fructose corn syrup contains about 42–55% fructose, with the remaining portion being glucose, making it similar to table sugar in both sweetness and calories. According to the FDA, there is no proof that high-fructose corn syrup is less healthy than sugar, honey, or other common sweeteners. The AMA concurs.
Studies confirm that both sweeteners deliver about 4 calories per gram, and their metabolic effects are comparable.
In short, swapping HFCS for sugar does not measurably improve health.
Economic and Supply Chain Factors
Switching to cane sugar in the U.S. would cost Coca‑Cola an estimated $619 million to over $1 billion annually. HFCS costs about half as much as cane sugar, due to corn subsidies and sugar import tariffs.
The U.S. relies on roughly 400 million bushels of corn to produce HFCS each year (≈ 2.5% of total corn output). Removing it could cost American corn farmers up to $5.1 billion.
And U.S. cane sugar production, 3.6 million metric tons annually, is insufficient to meet domestic demand.
Meeting demand would require huge increases in sugarcane yields or lower tariffs on Brazilian imports, currently subject to 50% tariffs.
Coca‑Cola’s bottling network is built around HFCS; reformulating for cane sugar would make ingredients, labeling, and packaging costly and complex.
Geographical Formulation Differences
Coca‑Cola already sells cane sugar‑sweetened versions in many countries, including Mexico and the UK. It’s sold as a high-end import and comes in glass bottles made with real sugar. High-fructose corn syrup has been widely used in the U.S. starting from the 1980s. The change at that time was motivated by cost savings rather than flavor or health concerns. Now, local regulations, ingredient costs, and consumer choices shape the recipe regionally.
Conclusion
Coca‑Cola defended HFCS as safe, calorie‑equivalent to sugar, and economical. Trump’s claim sparked intense debate, but experts say any health gain from cane sugar over HFCS is minimal. The real story lies in economics: corn production, trade policy, supply chains, and cost control.
Unless U.S. sugar policy and tariffs change dramatically, Coca‑Cola is unlikely to replace HFCS across all U.S. drinks. Instead, we’ll probably see niche cane‑sweetened variants, like “Mexican Coke”, remain, with core production unchanged. The real takeaway? Ingredient choices often reflect economics and regulation more than health worries or political theatrics.
FAQS:
Coca-Cola uses corn syrup because it is cheaper than cane sugar in the U.S. Government rules and corn farming make it easier to get and use.
Cane sugar and corn syrup provide the same number of calories. Doctors say they affect the body in similar ways. Consuming large amounts of either one is unhealthy.
Coca-Cola used only cane sugar in its recipe before the 1980s. In the U.S, in the early 1980s, they began using corn syrup instead, as it was more affordable.
Description:
This content is for informational purposes only and not financial advice. Always conduct your research.