Affirm Holdings, Inc.
Affirm Holdings, Inc. AFRM Peers
See (AFRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRM | $58.92 | +5.76% | 19B | -310.11 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| MSFT | $470.38 | +0.58% | 3.5T | 36.41 | $12.92 | +0.69% |
| ORCL | $174.03 | +1.69% | 488B | 40.85 | $4.26 | +0.97% |
| PLTR | $127.72 | +6.51% | 289B | 555.30 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $416.81 | +0.39% | 177.6B | 27.53 | $15.14 | N/A |
| PANW | $199.60 | +1.26% | 133.1B | 114.06 | $1.75 | N/A |
| CRWD | $468.41 | +1.18% | 116.7B | -678.86 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| FTNT | $104.94 | +1.39% | 80.3B | 43.19 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $486.22 | +0.83% | 75.4B | 56.15 | $8.66 | N/A |
| CRWV | $140.16 | +3.78% | 67.3B | -55.40 | -$2.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AFRM vs MSFT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while MSFT trades at $470.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ORCL Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 488B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ORCL trades at $174.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PLTR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 289B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while PLTR trades at $127.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 555.30. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ADBE Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 177.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ADBE trades at $416.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PANW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while PANW trades at $199.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 114.06. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CRWD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CRWD trades at $468.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -678.86. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FTNT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while FTNT trades at $104.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.19. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SNPS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SNPS trades at $486.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 56.15. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CRWV Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CRWV trades at $140.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -55.40. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs HOOD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while HOOD trades at $74.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 42.79. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NET Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while NET trades at $179.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -748.29. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs VMW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SQ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ZS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ZS trades at $303.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1122.33. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs XYZ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while XYZ trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NETE Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs VRSN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while VRSN trades at $285.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SPLK Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GDDY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while GDDY trades at $182.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs IOT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while IOT trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -205.14. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TOST Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while TOST trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 163.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CHKP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CHKP trades at $233.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CPAY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CPAY trades at $337.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FLT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NTNX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while NTNX trades at $77.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -296.58. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CYBR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CYBR trades at $403.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -199.88. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RBRK Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while RBRK trades at $98.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GEN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while GEN trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs MDB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while MDB trades at $220.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -203.83. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs OKTA Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while OKTA trades at $105.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 161.66. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FFIV Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while FFIV trades at $295.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs KSPI Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while KSPI trades at $85.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NLOK Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AKAM Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while AKAM trades at $77.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SAIL Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SAIL trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DOX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while DOX trades at $92.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ALTR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PLAN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs KVYO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while KVYO trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -200.29. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs WIX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while WIX trades at $152.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 60.44. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs INFA Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while INFA trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 804.67. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DBX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while DBX trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CFLT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CFLT trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -25.11. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs HCP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PATH Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while PATH trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -110.08. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs JCOM Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SQSP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FOUR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while FOUR trades at $94.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NEWR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CCCS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CCCS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 899.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs S Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while S trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs VRNS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while VRNS trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -62.52. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs BOX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while BOX trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SPSC Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SPSC trades at $142.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs QLYS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while QLYS trades at $141.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ACIW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ACIW trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NVEI Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EEFT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while EEFT trades at $111.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs WEX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while WEX trades at $138.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RELY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while RELY trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -718.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ODD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ODD trades at $77.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 44.45. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TENB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while TENB trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -86.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AVPT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while AVPT trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -150.46. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CLBT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CLBT trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -17.97. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ESMT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs STNE Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while STNE trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.58. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CORZ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CORZ trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CORZZ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CORZZ trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SWI Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EVOP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DLO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while DLO trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PAGS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while PAGS trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DOCN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while DOCN trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs MQ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while MQ trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 54.65. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PAYO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while PAYO trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs WRD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while WRD trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs BB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while BB trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -413.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs APPN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while APPN trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -38.77. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EVTC Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while EVTC trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FIVN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while FIVN trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -485.83. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RAMP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while RAMP trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -833.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TDC Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while TDC trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GETVV Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AVDX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while AVDX trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 245.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FORG Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GSKY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EVCM Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while EVCM trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -85.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CSGS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CSGS trades at $64.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CORZW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while CORZW trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GET Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NTCT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while NTCT trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs STER Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AVPTW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while AVPTW trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TUYA Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while TUYA trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 68.38. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ZUO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RPD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while RPD trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 57.85. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SUMO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while GB trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PGYWW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 19B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $58.92, while PGYWW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -310.11, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.