L'Air Liquide S.A.
L'Air Liquide S.A. AIQUF Peers
See (AIQUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQUF | $204.59 | +1.20% | 118B | 31.05 | $6.59 | +1.82% |
| AIQUY | $41.00 | +1.09% | 118.2B | 31.06 | $1.32 | +1.77% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | N/A | 48.4B | -509.09 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| GVDBF | $5,008.62 | -5.05% | 46.2B | 35.07 | $142.82 | +1.58% |
| GVDNY | $99.11 | +0.37% | 45.7B | 34.53 | $2.87 | +1.56% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | N/A | 45.6B | -52.67 | -$0.01 | +0.07% |
| SXYAY | $27.36 | +4.59% | 43.9B | 28.80 | $0.95 | +1.35% |
| SKFOF | $271.50 | +5.25% | 43.6B | 28.46 | $9.54 | +0.74% |
| AKZOY | $23.21 | +3.25% | 35.7B | 22.10 | $1.05 | +2.76% |
| NVZMY | $73.67 | +0.95% | 34.3B | 65.19 | $1.13 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
AIQUF vs AIQUY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while AIQUY trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs PTCAY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -509.09. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs GVDBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while GVDBF trades at $5,008.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs GVDNY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while GVDNY trades at $99.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs PTPIF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SXYAY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SXYAY trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SKFOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SKFOF trades at $271.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AKZOY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while AKZOY trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NVZMY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NVZMY trades at $73.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 65.19. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NVZMF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NVZMF trades at $72.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EMSHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while EMSHF trades at $771.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NPCPF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NPCPF trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYIEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SYIEF trades at $120.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYIEY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SYIEY trades at $28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs COVTY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while COVTY trades at $35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -29.61. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NDEKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NDEKF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CVVTF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AKZOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while AKZOF trades at $65.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CRTSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CHYHY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs BNTGF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while BNTGF trades at $71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EVKIY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while EVKIY trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EVKIF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while EVKIF trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs BNTGY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while BNTGY trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SCVUF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs IMDZF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while IMDZF trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FUPBY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while FUPBY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ASGLF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FUPPF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs OCLDY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while OCLDY trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 105.17. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs COIHY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while COIHY trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ASGLY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ASGLY trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs COIHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while COIHF trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SCVPY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKCBY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ARKAY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ARKAY trades at $71.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ARKAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ARKAF trades at $70.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FUPEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while FUPEF trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NDEKY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NDEKY trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs OCLDF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs MITUF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while MITUF trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KDSKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs MITUY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while MITUY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs JMPLF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while JMPLF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs JMPLY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while JMPLY trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AZLGF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while AZLGF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CLZNF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CLZNY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CLZNY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs WKCMF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while WKCMF trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NOFCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HXXPY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ICPVF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SASOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SASOF trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HXPLF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while HXPLF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs MBGCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while MBGCF trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KPTCY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while KPTCY trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs INCZY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KSANF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AWTRF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs LNXSY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while LNXSY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKKYY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs LNXSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while LNXSF trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs DACHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while DACHF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs IRLCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ZEOOY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs OCINF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while OCINF trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KPLIF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ZEOOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs BRRDF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KANKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ALZCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ALZCF trades at $148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKYMY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ELKEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ELKEF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CSNVY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CSNVY trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKCBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CSNVF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CSNVF trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HUABF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ALPKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ALPKF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -28.38. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CUYRF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EMNSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKYMF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs LNTEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ELMTY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs VTXPF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 998.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while VTXPF trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HUIHY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AECLY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SKKAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HASGF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs DALQF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYCHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs VBVBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 720M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs DLNDY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 688M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while DLNDY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TYOBY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FPLSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 563.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while FPLSF trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NOPMF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 407.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NOPMF trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -26.32. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TNMAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FLRAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 388.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while FLRAF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NCRBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYYYF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 118B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $204.59, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.05, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.