The Allstate Corporation
The Allstate Corporation ALL-PB Peers
See (ALL-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL-PB | $25.67 | +0.04% | 51.4B | 2.13 | $12.04 | +1.95% |
| PGR | $247.37 | +0.91% | 144.9B | 16.66 | $14.84 | +1.98% |
| CB | $278.73 | +1.72% | 111.7B | 13.43 | $20.75 | +1.33% |
| TRV | $266.78 | +1.34% | 60B | 11.79 | $22.61 | +1.59% |
| ALL | $197.43 | +2.34% | 52.3B | 13.50 | $14.64 | +1.95% |
| ALL-PH | $21.22 | -0.09% | 51.3B | 3.39 | $6.26 | +1.95% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.95% |
| WRB | $68.54 | +1.09% | 26B | 15.91 | $4.31 | +2.31% |
| WRB-PF | $19.79 | -0.20% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.31% |
| WRB-PH | $16.30 | -0.24% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.31% |
Stock Comparison
ALL-PB vs PGR Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while PGR trades at $247.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs CB Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while CB trades at $278.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs TRV Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while TRV trades at $266.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ALL Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ALL trades at $197.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ALL-PH Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ALL-PH trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ALL-PG Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs WRB Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while WRB trades at $68.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs WRB-PF Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while WRB-PF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs WRB-PH Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while WRB-PH trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs WRB-PE Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while WRB-PE trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs MKL Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while MKL trades at $2,022.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs WRB-PG Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while WRB-PG trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs CINF Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while CINF trades at $151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs L Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while L trades at $92.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas L's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs CNA Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while CNA trades at $44.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs KNSL Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while KNSL trades at $485.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AFG Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AFG trades at $128.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AFGD Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AFGD trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AFGB Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AFGB trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AFGC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AFGC trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AFGE Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AFGE trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AXS Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AXS trades at $96.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AXS-PE Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AXS-PE trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ALL-PJ Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs RLI Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while RLI trades at $69.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs THG Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while THG trades at $167.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs SIGI Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while SIGI trades at $90.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ALL-PI Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ALL-PI trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs WTM Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while WTM trades at $1,791.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 167.96. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs KMPR Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while KMPR trades at $62.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs KMPB Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while KMPB trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs MCY Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while MCY trades at $69.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs PLMR Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while PLMR trades at $137.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs HGTY-WT Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs LMND Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while LMND trades at $41.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AHL Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AHL trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AHL-PD Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AHL-PD trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -82.59. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs SKWD Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while SKWD trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ROOT Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ROOT trades at $126.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AHL-PE Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AHL-PE trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.59. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs HMN Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while HMN trades at $41.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs STC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while STC trades at $59.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs HCI Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while HCI trades at $142.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs MHLA Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while MHLA trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs PRA Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while PRA trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs BOW Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while BOW trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs SAFT Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while SAFT trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ARGO Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs SIGIP Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while SIGIP trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs HGTY Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 921.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while HGTY trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs UVE Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while UVE trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs UFCS Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while UFCS trades at $27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs HRTG Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 685.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while HRTG trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs DGICA Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 648.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while DGICA trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs DGICB Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while DGICB trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ACIC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ACIC trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs GBLI Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 446.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while GBLI trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AII Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AII trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs UIHC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs NODK Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while NODK trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 46.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs CNFRZ Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while CNFRZ trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs KINS Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while KINS trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs CNFR Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while CNFR trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs UNAM Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs HALL Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while HALL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs ARGO-PA Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 328. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs FNHC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AHL-PC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs MILE Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs AFHBL Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs Y Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs STFC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB and STFC have similar daily volatility (0.35).
ALL-PB vs MILEW Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.
ALL-PB vs NSEC Comparison
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 51.4B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.67, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 2.13, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.