American Tower Corporation
American Tower Corporation AMT Peers
See (AMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMT | $212.49 | -1.73% | 99.5B | 34.38 | $6.18 | +3.08% |
| EQIX | $914.43 | +0.52% | 89.4B | 95.95 | $9.53 | +1.95% |
| CCI | $98.95 | -1.33% | 43.1B | -10.98 | -$9.01 | +6.32% |
| IRM | $102.15 | +0.86% | 30.1B | 249.15 | $0.41 | +2.79% |
| SBAC | $225.68 | -1.73% | 24.2B | 29.81 | $7.57 | +1.85% |
| WY | $26.73 | +0.09% | 19.4B | 53.45 | $0.50 | +3.06% |
| GLPI | $46.44 | +0.76% | 12.8B | 16.47 | $2.82 | +6.56% |
| LAMR | $121.03 | +0.77% | 12.3B | 29.45 | $4.11 | +4.88% |
| EPR | $56.63 | +1.12% | 4.3B | 34.74 | $1.63 | +6.09% |
| RYN | $23.46 | +0.13% | 3.7B | 9.86 | $2.38 | +4.81% |
Stock Comparison
AMT vs EQIX Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while EQIX trades at $914.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 95.95. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CCI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while CCI trades at $98.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CCI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs IRM Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while IRM trades at $102.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 249.15. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs SBAC Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while SBAC trades at $225.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs WY Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while WY trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs GLPI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while GLPI trades at $46.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs LAMR Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while LAMR trades at $121.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while EPR trades at $56.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs RYN Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while RYN trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs PCH Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while PCH trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 63.36. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs OUT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while OUT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CXW Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while CXW trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PE Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while EPR-PE trades at $30.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PC Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while EPR-PC trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PG Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while EPR-PG trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs UNIT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while UNIT trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs LANDP Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while LANDP trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs FPI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 531.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while FPI trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs SMA Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while SMA trades at $36.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -105.60. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs AFCG Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while AFCG trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs PW Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while PW trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PW's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CTT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.5B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $212.49, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.