Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AP-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP-WT | $0.01 | +0.00% | 172.8K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CRS | $276.44 | +1.27% | 13.8B | 39.13 | $7.06 | +0.29% |
| ATI | $94.99 | +1.85% | 13.4B | 34.43 | $2.76 | N/A |
| MLI | $88.72 | +0.48% | 9.8B | 14.10 | $6.29 | +1.01% |
| ESAB | $133.28 | +0.92% | 8.1B | 27.65 | $4.82 | +0.26% |
| AZZ | $109.69 | +0.39% | 3.3B | 12.41 | $8.83 | +0.64% |
| WOR | $61.66 | -0.88% | 3.1B | 32.10 | $1.92 | +1.10% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| CMPO | $14.28 | -1.79% | 1.5B | -10.82 | -$1.32 | N/A |
| CMPOW | $6.50 | -1.96% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AP-WT vs CRS Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while CRS trades at $276.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 39.13. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check CRS's competition here
AP-WT vs ATI Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while ATI trades at $94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check ATI's competition here
AP-WT vs MLI Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while MLI trades at $88.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check MLI's competition here
AP-WT vs ESAB Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while ESAB trades at $133.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check ESAB's competition here
AP-WT vs AZZ Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while AZZ trades at $109.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check AZZ's competition here
AP-WT vs WOR Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while WOR trades at $61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check WOR's competition here
AP-WT vs ARNC Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check ARNC's competition here
AP-WT vs CMPO Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while CMPO trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check CMPO's competition here
AP-WT vs CMPOW Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while CMPOW trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check CMPOW's competition here
AP-WT vs PRLB Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 929.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while PRLB trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 65.17. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check PRLB's competition here
AP-WT vs HAYN Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check HAYN's competition here
AP-WT vs RYI Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 729.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while RYI trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -102.95. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check RYI's competition here
AP-WT vs IIIN Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while IIIN trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check IIIN's competition here
AP-WT vs NWPX Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while NWPX trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check NWPX's competition here
AP-WT vs MEC Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while MEC trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check MEC's competition here
AP-WT vs TG Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while TG trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -302.33. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check TG's competition here
AP-WT vs GIFI Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while GIFI trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check GIFI's competition here
AP-WT vs MTEN Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while MTEN trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check MTEN's competition here
AP-WT vs AP Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while AP trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check AP's competition here
AP-WT vs TPCS Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while TPCS trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check TPCS's competition here
AP-WT vs TRSG Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while TRSG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check TRSG's competition here
AP-WT vs LNKS Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while LNKS trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -16.68. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check LNKS's competition here
AP-WT vs HIHO Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while HIHO trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is 83.07. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check HIHO's competition here
AP-WT vs SGBX Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while SGBX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is more volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check SGBX's competition here
AP-WT vs ALPP Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while ALPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AP-WT is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AP-WT.Check ALPP's competition here
AP-WT vs CDSI Comparison July 2025
AP-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AP-WT stands at 172.8K. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AP-WT is priced at $0.01, while CDSI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AP-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AP-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AP-WT has daily volatility of 16.22 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here