Amphenol Corporation
Amphenol Corporation (APH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (APH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APH | $104.46 | +3.72% | 126.4B | 41.63 | $2.51 | +0.63% |
| TEL | $205.60 | +1.76% | 61B | 42.22 | $4.87 | +1.29% |
| GLW | $55.72 | -0.14% | 47.7B | 107.18 | $0.52 | +2.00% |
| GRMN | $231.71 | -0.12% | 44.6B | 30.57 | $7.58 | +1.36% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $165.61 | -1.41% | 28.5B | 38.80 | $4.27 | N/A |
| TDY | $549.93 | +0.61% | 25.8B | 30.31 | $18.15 | N/A |
| JBL | $218.41 | -4.69% | 23.4B | 41.60 | $5.25 | +0.15% |
| TRMB | $84.19 | +0.68% | 20.1B | 13.73 | $6.13 | N/A |
| CLS | $163.98 | -2.85% | 18.9B | 45.83 | $3.58 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
APH vs TEL Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while TEL trades at $205.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check TEL's competition here
APH vs GLW Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while GLW trades at $55.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 107.18. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check GLW's competition here
APH vs GRMN Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while GRMN trades at $231.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check GRMN's competition here
APH vs IIVI Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check IIVI's competition here
APH vs KEYS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while KEYS trades at $165.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check KEYS's competition here
APH vs TDY Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while TDY trades at $549.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check TDY's competition here
APH vs JBL Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while JBL trades at $218.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check JBL's competition here
APH vs TRMB Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while TRMB trades at $84.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check TRMB's competition here
APH vs CLS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while CLS trades at $163.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 45.83. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check CLS's competition here
APH vs FLEX Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while FLEX trades at $49.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check FLEX's competition here
APH vs FTV Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while FTV trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check FTV's competition here
APH vs COHR Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while COHR trades at $98.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -448.68. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check COHR's competition here
APH vs FN Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while FN trades at $304.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check FN's competition here
APH vs MKSI Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MKSI trades at $99.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MKSI's competition here
APH vs SNDK Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SNDK trades at $42.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SNDK's competition here
APH vs ITRI Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ITRI trades at $133.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ITRI's competition here
APH vs VNT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while VNT trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check VNT's competition here
APH vs CGNX Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while CGNX trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 49.52. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check CGNX's competition here
APH vs LFUS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while LFUS trades at $228.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 59.92. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check LFUS's competition here
APH vs BMI Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BMI trades at $189.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BMI's competition here
APH vs SANM Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SANM trades at $95.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SANM's competition here
APH vs ESE Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ESE trades at $188.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ESE's competition here
APH vs ST Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ST trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ST's competition here
APH vs NOVT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while NOVT trades at $125.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check NOVT's competition here
APH vs TTMI Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while TTMI trades at $44.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 59.01. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check TTMI's competition here
APH vs OSIS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OSIS trades at $224.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OSIS's competition here
APH vs PLXS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while PLXS trades at $118.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check PLXS's competition here
APH vs BMNR Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BMNR trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BMNR's competition here
APH vs VICR Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while VICR trades at $47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check VICR's competition here
APH vs OUST Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OUST trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OUST's competition here
APH vs BHE Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BHE trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BHE's competition here
APH vs PENG Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while PENG trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -85.86. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check PENG's competition here
APH vs BELFA Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BELFA trades at $91.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BELFA's competition here
APH vs BELFB Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BELFB trades at $102.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BELFB's competition here
APH vs CTS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while CTS trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check CTS's competition here
APH vs ROG Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ROG trades at $65.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 72.72. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ROG's competition here
APH vs FARO Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check FARO's competition here
APH vs DAKT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while DAKT trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -78.29. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check DAKT's competition here
APH vs BKSY-WT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 738M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
APH vs BKSY Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 715.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BKSY trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BKSY's competition here
APH vs OUST-WTA Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
APH vs ALNT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 665M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ALNT trades at $39.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 67.72. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ALNT's competition here
APH vs AMOT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check AMOT's competition here
APH vs LYTS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 538.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while LYTS trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check LYTS's competition here
APH vs NEON Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 485.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while NEON trades at $28.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -78.16. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check NEON's competition here
APH vs OUST-WT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OUST-WT's competition here
APH vs MLAB Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 409.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MLAB trades at $74.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -206.72. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MLAB's competition here
APH vs MVIS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 373.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MVIS trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MVIS's competition here
APH vs SATL Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SATL trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SATL's competition here
APH vs VPG Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while VPG trades at $27.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 118.78. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check VPG's competition here
APH vs SATLW Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 356.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SATLW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SATLW's competition here
APH vs KOPN Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 354.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while KOPN trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check KOPN's competition here
APH vs VLDR Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check VLDR's competition here
APH vs KULR Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 255.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while KULR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check KULR's competition here
APH vs MEI Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MEI trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MEI's competition here
APH vs EMAN Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check EMAN's competition here
APH vs RELL Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while RELL trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -72.40. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check RELL's competition here
APH vs LPTH Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while LPTH trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check LPTH's competition here
APH vs MPTI Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MPTI trades at $42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MPTI's competition here
APH vs WBX Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while WBX trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check WBX's competition here
APH vs GNSS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while GNSS trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check GNSS's competition here
APH vs OPTX Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OPTX trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 227.00. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OPTX's competition here
APH vs ODYS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ODYS trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ODYS's competition here
APH vs WRAP Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while WRAP trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check WRAP's competition here
APH vs LINK Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while LINK trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check LINK's competition here
APH vs ELTK Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ELTK trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ELTK's competition here
APH vs MIND Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MIND trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MIND's competition here
APH vs REFR Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while REFR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -45.75. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check REFR's competition here
APH vs SOTK Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SOTK trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SOTK's competition here
APH vs DSWL Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while DSWL trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check DSWL's competition here
APH vs SELX Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SELX trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SELX's competition here
APH vs LGL Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while LGL trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 97.00. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check LGL's competition here
APH vs SVRE Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SVRE trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SVRE's competition here
APH vs CPSH Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while CPSH trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check CPSH's competition here
APH vs ISNS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ISNS's competition here
APH vs LUNA Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while LUNA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check LUNA's competition here
APH vs DAIO Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while DAIO trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check DAIO's competition here
APH vs MTEK Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MTEK trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -21.19. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MTEK's competition here
APH vs HOLOW Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while HOLOW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check HOLOW's competition here
APH vs HOLO Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while HOLO trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check HOLO's competition here
APH vs NSYS Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while NSYS trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check NSYS's competition here
APH vs TMPOW Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check TMPOW's competition here
APH vs FCUV Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while FCUV trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check FCUV's competition here
APH vs KNW Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while KNW trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check KNW's competition here
APH vs SGMA Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SGMA trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SGMA's competition here
APH vs VIAO Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check VIAO's competition here
APH vs ELSE Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while ELSE trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check ELSE's competition here
APH vs OST Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OST trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OST's competition here
APH vs WATT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while WATT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check WATT's competition here
APH vs SLNH Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SLNH trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SLNH's competition here
APH vs SLNHP Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SLNHP trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SLNHP's competition here
APH vs SVREW Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SVREW's competition here
APH vs SOBR Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while SOBR trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check SOBR's competition here
APH vs BNSO Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check BNSO's competition here
APH vs MINDP Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MINDP's competition here
APH vs OUSTZ Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OUSTZ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OUSTZ's competition here
APH vs OPTXW Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while OPTXW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check OPTXW's competition here
APH vs IMTE Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while IMTE trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check IMTE's competition here
APH vs MMAT Comparison July 2025
APH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APH stands at 126.4B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APH is priced at $104.46, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APH's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APH is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APH.Check MMAT's competition here