Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Apollo Global Management, Inc. APO-PA Peers
See (APO-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APO-PA | $71.10 | +2.16% | 40.6B | 8.54 | $8.32 | +1.42% |
| APO | $133.44 | +2.43% | 76.3B | 23.29 | $5.73 | +1.42% |
| SGIIX | $75.86 | +0.09% | 60.1B | 18.13 | $4.19 | N/A |
| FEGRX | $75.90 | +0.09% | 60.1B | 18.13 | $4.19 | N/A |
| SGENX | $75.34 | +0.09% | 58.4B | 18.12 | $4.16 | N/A |
| FESGX | $71.69 | +0.08% | 58.4B | 18.11 | $3.96 | N/A |
| GBLEX | $38.96 | -0.08% | 26.8B | 20.17 | $1.93 | N/A |
| MDLOX | $19.92 | N/A | 16.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AGVEX | $25.60 | -0.27% | 15.7B | 25.57 | $1.00 | N/A |
| FSGGX | $16.72 | +0.12% | 11.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
APO-PA vs APO Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while APO trades at $133.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs SGIIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while SGIIX trades at $75.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs FEGRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while FEGRX trades at $75.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs SGENX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while SGENX trades at $75.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs FESGX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while FESGX trades at $71.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs GBLEX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while GBLEX trades at $38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs MDLOX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while MDLOX trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs AGVEX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while AGVEX trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs FSGGX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while FSGGX trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs GLIFX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while GLIFX trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs GLFOX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while GLFOX trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs AAM-PB Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs AAM-PA Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs QYLD Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while QYLD trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PAVE Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PAVE trades at $42.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs VHGEX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while VHGEX trades at $37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs DFGEX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while DFGEX trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JATSX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JATSX trades at $60.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JATAX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JATAX trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JAGCX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JAGCX trades at $51.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JATNX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JATNX trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JNGTX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JNGTX trades at $66.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JATIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JATIX trades at $67.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JAGTX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JAGTX trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PRGSX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PRGSX trades at $65.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PAGSX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PAGSX trades at $64.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PGGFX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PGGFX trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PRJZX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PRJZX trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs ACWV Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while ACWV trades at $118.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PRJQX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PRJQX trades at $46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 42.47. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CGGO Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CGGO trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JDWNX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JDWNX trades at $117.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JNGLX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JNGLX trades at $65.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JFNAX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JFNAX trades at $63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JAGLX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JAGLX trades at $65.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JFNCX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JFNCX trades at $54.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JFNSX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JFNSX trades at $62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JFNNX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JFNNX trades at $65.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JFNIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JFNIX trades at $65.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs GUNR Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while GUNR trades at $39.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs IOO Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while IOO trades at $104.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PRGTX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PRGTX trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JWGRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JWGRX trades at $120.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JAWWX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JAWWX trades at $117.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs REET Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while REET trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JWWCX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JWWCX trades at $113.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JWWFX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JWWFX trades at $120.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JDWAX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JDWAX trades at $119.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JDWRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JDWRX trades at $117.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CTYRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CTHCX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CTHCX trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CTCAX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CTCAX trades at $88.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CMTFX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CMTFX trades at $93.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs VNQI Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while VNQI trades at $44.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VNQI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs DGSIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while DGSIX trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs BGHIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while BGHIX trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CGTUX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CGTUX trades at $96.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CTHRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CTHRX trades at $96.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs MGGIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while MGGIX trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs MGGPX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while MGGPX trades at $36.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs IXJ Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while IXJ trades at $86.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs XYLD Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, XYLD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while XYLD trades at $38.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas XYLD's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XYLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to XYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs LGMAX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while LGMAX trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs URA Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, URA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while URA trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas URA's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to URA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to URA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs LGMCX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while LGMCX trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs MSFBX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, MSFBX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while MSFBX trades at $34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas MSFBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSFBX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to MSFBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs LSWWX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while LSWWX trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs GNR Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while GNR trades at $53.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs MSFLX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, MSFLX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while MSFLX trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas MSFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to MSFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs MLPX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while MLPX trades at $62.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CCHRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs APDGX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while APDGX trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs APHGX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while APHGX trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs ARTGX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while ARTGX trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs BOTZ Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while BOTZ trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JORIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JORIX trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JORAX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JORAX trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JORFX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JORFX trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JORNX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JORNX trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JSLNX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JSLNX trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs VGWLX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while VGWLX trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs VGWAX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while VGWAX trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs FTGC Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, FTGC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while FTGC trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas FTGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to FTGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JORRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JORRX trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs OPGIX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while OPGIX trades at $48.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs DFGR Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while DFGR trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs NFRA Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while NFRA trades at $61.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs JORCX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while JORCX trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs SGTTX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while SGTTX trades at $74.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PFFD Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PFFD trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs GCOW Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while GCOW trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GCOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs CSGZX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while CSGZX trades at $73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs BIALX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while BIALX trades at $29.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs VMVFX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, VMVFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while VMVFX trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas VMVFX's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VMVFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to VMVFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs VMNVX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, VMNVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while VMNVX trades at $33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas VMNVX's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VMNVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to VMNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs MWEFX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, MWEFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while MWEFX trades at $45.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas MWEFX's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MWEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to MWEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs PGINX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, PGINX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while PGINX trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas PGINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to PGINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs ARTRX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, ARTRX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while ARTRX trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas ARTRX's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to ARTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.
APO-PA vs IILGX Comparison
APO-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APO-PA stands at 40.6B. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APO-PA is priced at $71.10, while IILGX trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APO-PA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APO-PA is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APO-PA.