Evoqua Water Technologies Corp.
Evoqua Water Technologies Corp. (AQUA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AQUA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| VLTO | $103.27 | +1.43% | 25.6B | 29.50 | $3.50 | +0.41% |
| FSS | $107.48 | -0.84% | 6.6B | 31.53 | $3.41 | +0.48% |
| ZWS | $37.83 | +1.04% | 6.4B | 39.39 | $0.96 | +0.92% |
| ATMU | $38.04 | -0.96% | 3.1B | 17.13 | $2.22 | +0.52% |
| PCT | $15.58 | -1.95% | 2.8B | -13.20 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $22.85 | +4.01% | 2.4B | -30.50 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| CECO | $33.88 | +0.12% | 1.2B | 25.99 | $1.30 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $5.50 | -4.18% | 988.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ERII | $13.91 | +0.43% | 759.2M | 38.69 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AQUA vs VLTO Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while VLTO trades at $103.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check VLTO's competition here
AQUA vs FSS Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while FSS trades at $107.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check FSS's competition here
AQUA vs ZWS Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ZWS trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ZWS's competition here
AQUA vs ATMU Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ATMU trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ATMU's competition here
AQUA vs PCT Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCT trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check PCT's competition here
AQUA vs PCTTU Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCTTU trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check PCTTU's competition here
AQUA vs CECO Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CECO trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CECO's competition here
AQUA vs PCTTW Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 988.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCTTW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check PCTTW's competition here
AQUA vs ERII Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 759.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ERII trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ERII's competition here
AQUA vs CECE Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CECE's competition here
AQUA vs ARQ Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ARQ trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -115.60. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ARQ's competition here
AQUA vs ADES Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ADES's competition here
AQUA vs FTEK Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while FTEK trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -31.22. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check FTEK's competition here
AQUA vs SCWO Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SCWO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check SCWO's competition here
AQUA vs ZONE Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ZONE trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ZONE's competition here
AQUA vs CLIR Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CLIR trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CLIR's competition here
AQUA vs BHTG Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check BHTG's competition here
AQUA vs LIQT Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while LIQT trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check LIQT's competition here
AQUA vs TOMZ Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while TOMZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check TOMZ's competition here
AQUA vs DEVS Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while DEVS trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check DEVS's competition here
AQUA vs CLWT Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CLWT trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CLWT's competition here
AQUA vs MKUL Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check MKUL's competition here
AQUA vs RAINW Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while RAINW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAINW's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check RAINW's competition here
AQUA vs SPECW Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check SPECW's competition here
AQUA vs SPEC Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check SPEC's competition here
AQUA vs AERC Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check AERC's competition here
AQUA vs NEWA Comparison July 2025
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check NEWA's competition here