Bank of America Corporation
Bank of America Corporation BAC-PM Peers
See (BAC-PM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAC-PM | $21.86 | -0.64% | 164.6B | 6.22 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| JPM-PC | $25.42 | -0.04% | 824.4B | 1.89 | $13.48 | +1.78% |
| JPM-PD | $24.94 | -0.04% | 824.4B | 1.85 | $13.48 | +1.78% |
| JPM | $296.55 | -0.07% | 824.3B | 15.21 | $19.50 | +1.78% |
| BAC-PL | $1,222.00 | +0.00% | 460.2B | 347.75 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BAC | $48.39 | +0.52% | 364.6B | 14.20 | $3.41 | +2.14% |
| BML-PJ | $21.53 | +0.47% | 364.3B | 6.13 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BML-PH | $20.44 | +0.00% | 362.6B | 5.82 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BAC-PB | $25.16 | -0.08% | 362.3B | 7.16 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
| BAC-PK | $24.44 | -0.16% | 361.7B | 6.95 | $3.51 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
BAC-PM vs JPM-PC Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 824.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while JPM-PC trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs JPM-PD Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 824.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while JPM-PD trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs JPM Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 824.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while JPM trades at $296.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PL Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 460.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PL trades at $1,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 347.75. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 364.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BML-PJ Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 364.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BML-PJ trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BML-PH Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 362.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BML-PH trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PB Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 362.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PB trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PK Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 361.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PK trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BML-PL Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 361.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BML-PL trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PE Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 361.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PE trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BML-PG Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 359.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BML-PG trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 272.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC trades at $83.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PL Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 272.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PL trades at $1,185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 245.22. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs HSBC Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 226.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while HSBC trades at $64.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PQ Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PY Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 191.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PY trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs RY Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 186.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while RY trades at $132.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PR Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs C Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while C trades at $95.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas C's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs MUFG Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while MUFG trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PN Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PN trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PS Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PS trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PO Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PO trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs SAN Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while SAN trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs TD Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while TD trades at $74.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PQ Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 130.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BAC-PP Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BAC-PP trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PC Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PC trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.90. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs C-PJ Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs UBS Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while UBS trades at $38.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs RY-PT Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BBVA Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BBVA trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BMO Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BMO trades at $114.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BNS Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BNS trades at $56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs ING Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while ING trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs CM Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while CM trades at $73.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs BCS Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while BCS trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs SMFG Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while SMFG trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PZ Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs NU Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while NU trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PA Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WFC-PD Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WFC-PD trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs JPM-PJ Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs JPM-PL Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while JPM-PL trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs JPM-PK Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while JPM-PK trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs JPM-PM Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while JPM-PM trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs C-PK Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs NWG Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while NWG trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs EWBC Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while EWBC trades at $103.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs CS Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs NTB Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while NTB trades at $44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs TANNL Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs FRC-PL Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.
BAC-PM vs WBK Comparison
BAC-PM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC-PM stands at 164.6B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAC-PM is priced at $21.86, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC-PM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, BAC-PM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC-PM is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC-PM.