Braskem S.A.
Braskem S.A. BAK Peers
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $3.70 | +0.41% | 1.5B | -0.90 | -$4.10 | N/A |
| DOW | $28.52 | +1.21% | 20.2B | 71.30 | $0.40 | +9.82% |
| CE | $55.48 | +1.75% | 6.1B | -3.67 | -$15.12 | +2.64% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $33.14 | +1.01% | 2.2B | 10.83 | $3.06 | +2.23% |
| HUN | $11.38 | +0.71% | 2B | -14.59 | -$0.78 | +8.82% |
| TROX | $5.88 | +2.71% | 931M | -6.18 | -$0.95 | +8.50% |
| WLKP | $22.17 | -0.01% | 781.2M | 14.88 | $1.49 | +8.49% |
| ASPI | $9.36 | +6.85% | 702.6M | -15.86 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| ASIX | $23.83 | +1.02% | 638.9M | 7.61 | $3.13 | +2.69% |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs DOW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while DOW trades at $28.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is 71.30. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to DOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs CE Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while CE trades at $55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs UNVR Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs MEOH Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while MEOH trades at $33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs HUN Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while HUN trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.59. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs TROX Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 931M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while TROX trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs WLKP Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 781.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while WLKP trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ASPI Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 702.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while ASPI trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -15.86. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ASIX Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 638.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while ASIX trades at $23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs LXU Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 552.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while LXU trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to LXU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs SIRE Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs VHI Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while VHI trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs CINR Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs RYAM Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while RYAM trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FF Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while FF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -25.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ORGN Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while ORGN trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FMST Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while FMST trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while FMSTW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while ORGNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs MKD Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.70, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.90, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.