BHPA Inc.
BHPA Inc. (BHPA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BHPA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHPA | $0.20 | +0.00% | 820.8M | -0.02 | -$11.16 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $290.30 | -0.22% | 337.3B | 44.97 | $6.44 | +0.91% |
| CNSWF | $3,430.81 | +2.55% | 74.7B | 100.29 | $35.13 | +0.11% |
| INVUP | $26.01 | +0.00% | 48.3B | -1734.00 | -$0.02 | +12.50% |
| DASTF | $31.72 | -0.30% | 42.6B | 32.91 | $0.98 | +0.88% |
| DASTY | $32.06 | +0.22% | 41.4B | 31.77 | $0.99 | +0.94% |
| WIGBY | $74.88 | +0.01% | 25.8B | 127.23 | $0.61 | +0.17% |
| DIDIY | $5.38 | -2.89% | 25.3B | 68.00 | $0.08 | N/A |
| WTCHF | $73.00 | +0.00% | 25B | 123.59 | $0.61 | +0.17% |
| NEMTF | $143.50 | +0.00% | 18.8B | 86.10 | $1.89 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
BHPA vs SAPGF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 337.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SAPGF trades at $290.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SAPGF's competition here
BHPA vs CNSWF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while CNSWF trades at $3,430.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 100.29. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check CNSWF's competition here
BHPA vs INVUP Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while INVUP trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1734.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check INVUP's competition here
BHPA vs DASTF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while DASTF trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check DASTF's competition here
BHPA vs DASTY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while DASTY trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check DASTY's competition here
BHPA vs WIGBY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while WIGBY trades at $74.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 127.23. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check WIGBY's competition here
BHPA vs DIDIY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while DIDIY trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check DIDIY's competition here
BHPA vs WTCHF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while WTCHF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 123.59. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check WTCHF's competition here
BHPA vs NEMTF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NEMTF trades at $143.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 86.10. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NEMTF's competition here
BHPA vs XROLF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while XROLF trades at $109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 126.41. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check XROLF's competition here
BHPA vs OBIIF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while OBIIF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check OBIIF's competition here
BHPA vs NEMKY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NEMKY trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NEMKY's competition here
BHPA vs SGGEF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SGGEF trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SGGEF's competition here
BHPA vs OCLCF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while OCLCF trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check OCLCF's competition here
BHPA vs SGPYY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SGPYY trades at $63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SGPYY's competition here
BHPA vs NCSYF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NCSYF trades at $157.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NCSYF's competition here
BHPA vs KGDEY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while KGDEY trades at $239.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -397.73. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check KGDEY's competition here
BHPA vs TMSNY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TMSNY trades at $90.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TMSNY's competition here
BHPA vs ALMFF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ALMFF's competition here
BHPA vs LIFX Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while LIFX trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 568.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check LIFX's competition here
BHPA vs HOILF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check HOILF's competition here
BHPA vs TMNSF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TMNSF trades at $91.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TMNSF's competition here
BHPA vs SRBEF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SRBEF trades at $250.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -155.81. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SRBEF's competition here
BHPA vs THNOF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check THNOF's competition here
BHPA vs FNOXF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check FNOXF's competition here
BHPA vs ASOZF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ASOZF's competition here
BHPA vs SMCYY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SMCYY's competition here
BHPA vs SICRF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SICRF's competition here
BHPA vs KXSCF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while KXSCF trades at $141.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 408.24. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check KXSCF's competition here
BHPA vs ASOZY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ASOZY's competition here
BHPA vs ZEUCF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ZEUCF's competition here
BHPA vs ISDSF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ISDSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ISDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ISDSF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ISDSF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ISDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ISDSF's competition here
BHPA vs WEMXF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check WEMXF's competition here
BHPA vs TMVWF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TMVWF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TMVWF's competition here
BHPA vs UBMRF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check UBMRF's competition here
BHPA vs KHOTF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check KHOTF's competition here
BHPA vs SWONF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SWONF trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -820.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SWONF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SWONF's competition here
BHPA vs IDXAF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, IDXAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while IDXAF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IDXAF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to IDXAF's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to IDXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check IDXAF's competition here
BHPA vs QTGPF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while QTGPF trades at $52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check QTGPF's competition here
BHPA vs ESKEF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ESKEF's competition here
BHPA vs TMVWY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TMVWY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TMVWY's competition here
BHPA vs TMOAY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TMOAY trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TMOAY's competition here
BHPA vs VOBIF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 60.30. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check VOBIF's competition here
BHPA vs FREKF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while FREKF trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check FREKF's competition here
BHPA vs MAGTF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check MAGTF's competition here
BHPA vs IPEU Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check IPEU's competition here
BHPA vs MVVYF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, MVVYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while MVVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MVVYF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to MVVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to MVVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check MVVYF's competition here
BHPA vs KNNNF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while KNNNF trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check KNNNF's competition here
BHPA vs GBGPF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check GBGPF's competition here
BHPA vs LTTHF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check LTTHF's competition here
BHPA vs ESIGF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ESIGF's competition here
BHPA vs EGHSF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while EGHSF trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check EGHSF's competition here
BHPA vs TTMZF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 870.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TTMZF's competition here
BHPA vs BTRCF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 824.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while BTRCF trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check BTRCF's competition here
BHPA vs TMOAF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TMOAF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TMOAF's competition here
BHPA vs SLVFF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SLVFF's competition here
BHPA vs XMMRF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check XMMRF's competition here
BHPA vs MENXF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, MENXF has a market cap of 599.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while MENXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MENXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to MENXF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to MENXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check MENXF's competition here
BHPA vs SNNSF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SNNSF has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SNNSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNNSF's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SNNSF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SNNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SNNSF's competition here
BHPA vs NXLLF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 530.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NXLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 160.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NXLLF's competition here
BHPA vs NPACY Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 525.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NPACY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NPACY's competition here
BHPA vs RWWI Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check RWWI's competition here
BHPA vs PSSWF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check PSSWF's competition here
BHPA vs NSWEF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NSWEF's competition here
BHPA vs CHNVF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check CHNVF's competition here
BHPA vs BRDLF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check BRDLF's competition here
BHPA vs NPACF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NPACF's competition here
BHPA vs BVSFF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check BVSFF's competition here
BHPA vs IQGLF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check IQGLF's competition here
BHPA vs TCYSF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while TCYSF trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 123.45. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check TCYSF's competition here
BHPA vs ABXXF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 400.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ABXXF trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ABXXF's competition here
BHPA vs CMDXF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 379.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while CMDXF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check CMDXF's competition here
BHPA vs BLKLF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while BLKLF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -63.18. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check BLKLF's competition here
BHPA vs RPGHF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check RPGHF's competition here
BHPA vs LCHTF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while LCHTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check LCHTF's competition here
BHPA vs RTME Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check RTME's competition here
BHPA vs PLDIF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while PLDIF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check PLDIF's competition here
BHPA vs JAPPF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check JAPPF's competition here
BHPA vs ELMFF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check ELMFF's competition here
BHPA vs PXPHF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check PXPHF's competition here
BHPA vs RLLMF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while RLLMF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -67.17. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check RLLMF's competition here
BHPA vs PTRRF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while PTRRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check PTRRF's competition here
BHPA vs IVUFF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check IVUFF's competition here
BHPA vs CIGMF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check CIGMF's competition here
BHPA vs DOTDF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while DOTDF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check DOTDF's competition here
BHPA vs BAINF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while BAINF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check BAINF's competition here
BHPA vs EXMXF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check EXMXF's competition here
BHPA vs MCAP Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 265.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while MCAP trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check MCAP's competition here
BHPA vs LOQPF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check LOQPF's competition here
BHPA vs SMTEF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SMTEF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SMTEF's competition here
BHPA vs IARGF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 226M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check IARGF's competition here
BHPA vs DAHLF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check DAHLF's competition here
BHPA vs EXSPF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while EXSPF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check EXSPF's competition here
BHPA vs FXSRF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check FXSRF's competition here
BHPA vs FBSFF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 192.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check FBSFF's competition here
BHPA vs NEOJF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check NEOJF's competition here
BHPA vs WONDF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 166M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check WONDF's competition here
BHPA vs SYZLF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while SYZLF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -163.50. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check SYZLF's competition here
BHPA vs CBSZF Comparison August 2025
BHPA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPA stands at 820.8M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPA is priced at $0.20, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, BHPA's ROE is -8.62%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPA is more volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPA.Check CBSZF's competition here