BHP Group Limited
BHP Group Limited BHPLF Peers
See (BHPLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHPLF | $23.56 | -6.08% | 119.5B | 10.52 | $2.24 | +5.27% |
| RTPPF | $59.00 | N/A | 99.8B | 8.35 | $7.07 | +6.81% |
| RTNTF | $66.32 | +3.87% | 94.9B | 9.38 | $7.07 | +3.54% |
| GLNCY | $7.45 | -3.61% | 45.7B | -28.66 | -$0.26 | +2.89% |
| GLCNF | $3.75 | -2.47% | 44.6B | -28.85 | -$0.13 | +3.07% |
| GMBXF | $5.53 | +0.55% | 43.1B | 11.52 | $0.48 | +3.36% |
| AAUKF | $28.50 | N/A | 39.3B | -9.93 | -$2.87 | +2.55% |
| NGLOY | $14.34 | -1.31% | 30.6B | -9.96 | -$1.44 | +2.34% |
| FSUGY | $19.80 | +4.43% | 30.4B | 7.83 | $2.53 | +9.17% |
| FSUMF | $9.83 | +1.91% | 30.2B | 7.74 | $1.27 | +9.00% |
Stock Comparison
BHPLF vs RTPPF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while RTPPF trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs RTNTF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while RTNTF trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs GLNCY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while GLNCY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.66. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs GLCNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while GLCNF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.85. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs GMBXF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while GMBXF trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs AAUKF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while AAUKF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs NGLOY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while NGLOY trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs FSUGY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while FSUGY trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs FSUMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while FSUMF trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs CMCLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while CMCLF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs TCKRF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while TCKRF trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 670.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs IPOAF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while IPOAF trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs IVPAF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while IVPAF trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs BOLIF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs JXMNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs BDNNY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while BDNNY trades at $60.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs SHTLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while SHTLF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.71. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ABML Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs STMNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs SMMYY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while SMMYY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.40. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs LYSCF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while LYSCF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 149.38. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs LYSDY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while LYSDY trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 149.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PUTKF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PUTKY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PUTKY trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs NILSY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PAEKY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs JMXXF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while JMXXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs FLMMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MALRY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MALRY trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs CHZQ Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MALRF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PILBF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PILBF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -82.33. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs NGXXF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while NGXXF trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -37.81. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PTNDY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MIMTF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs IPGDF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while IPGDF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs IIDDY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs NICMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs AZZVF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs DWMNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while DWMNF trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs AFBOF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs SOUHY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while SOUHY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.85. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PTNDF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ERMAF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ERMAY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs BQSSF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while BQSSF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -77.75. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ADTLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ADTLF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs DETRF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while DETRF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs LINRF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while LINRF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -48.74. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ADMLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ADMLF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs AZRMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs AUSDF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MFRVF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ILKAY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ILKAY trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ILKAF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ILKAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs FMCXF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 998.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while FMCXF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -59.19. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ARDNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 950.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ARDNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ARDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs STTSY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ATUSF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 906.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ATUSF trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs TAOFF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while TAOFF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs AFMJF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 777.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while AFMJF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ALMTF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 671.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ALMTF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -19.42. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs AMVMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 655.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while AMVMF trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -53.47. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs CTJHF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs VULNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while VULNF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MJDLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 515.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MJDLF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs FGOVF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 501.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while FGOVF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -94.87. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs TTNNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs OSTTF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PXMFF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MCRZF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MCHHF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs BIRNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MNXMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MNXMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.51. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs CGMLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs KMRPF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 387.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while KMRPF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs REEMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 381.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while REEMF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs NQMIY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MLYF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs CREQF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs CTJHY Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MLXEF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MLXEF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs FWEDF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while FWEDF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ERLFF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ERLFF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.74. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs LTSRF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ARAFF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs SVMLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while SVMLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs BSSMF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs LRSRF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs SLGGF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while SLGGF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs STQNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs EMOTF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 247M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while EMOTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -23.37. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MMILF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs PMETF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 243.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while PMETF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -50.06. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs MGMNF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while MGMNF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs ERDCF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while ERDCF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -65.45. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs RXRLF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs LTHHF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.
BHPLF vs BSRUF Comparison
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $23.56, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.52, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.