Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 242.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while IBM trades at $260.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check IBM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while ACN trades at $281.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ACN's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while FISV trades at $114.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FISV's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while FI trades at $140.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while INFY trades at $17.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check INFY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CTSH trades at $76.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTSH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while WIT trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WIT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while IT trades at $356.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check IT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CDW trades at $180.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CDW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while GIB trades at $101.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GIB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while LDOS trades at $163.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check LDOS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while JKHY trades at $180.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check JKHY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while AUR trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check AUR's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while AUROW trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check AUROW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CACI trades at $478.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CACI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while EPAM trades at $168.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check EPAM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while KD trades at $38.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check KD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while G trades at $45.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check G's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while DLB trades at $76.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DLB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while EXLS trades at $42.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check EXLS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while GDS trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 327.45. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GDS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while WAY trades at $36.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 308.25. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WAY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while SAIC trades at $114.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SAIC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while INGM trades at $21.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check INGM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while GLOB trades at $88.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GLOB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CNXC trades at $60.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CNXC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NCR's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while PAY trades at $28.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 72.18. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PAY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while AI trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check AI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while WNS trades at $74.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WNS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CD trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CLVT trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CLVT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PRFT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while DXC trades at $14.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DXC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while APLD trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check APLD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while ASGN trades at $55.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ASGN's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while BBAI trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BBAI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while VNET trades at $8.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -833.00. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VNET's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while VYX trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VYX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while FORTY trades at $129.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FORTY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while NYAX trades at $46.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 243.21. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NYAX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while NABL trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 101.44. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NABL's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while TASK trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TASK's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while INOD trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check INOD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TWKS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while FLYW trades at $11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 295.50. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FLYW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while MGIC trades at $21.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check MGIC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 892.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while LZMH trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 587.00. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check LZMH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 877.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while GDYN trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 79.85. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GDYN's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 812M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CTLP trades at $11.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTLP's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 803.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while PSFE trades at $13.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -677.00. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PSFE's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while XRX trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check XRX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 719.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 674.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while TSSI trades at $26.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 74.86. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TSSI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 641M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while HCKT trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check HCKT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 447.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CNDT trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CNDT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 407.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while IBEX trades at $30.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check IBEX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 324.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while SDHIU trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SDHIU's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while UIS trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check UIS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while PHLT trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -45.75. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PHLT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while DMRC trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DMRC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BULLZ's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 252.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while TTEC trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TTEC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while III trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas III's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check III's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while TLS trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TLS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while SAIHW trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SAIHW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SRT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTG's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while LHSW trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 59.60. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check LHSW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NOTE-WT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while SAIH trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SAIH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 118.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while NOTE trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NOTE's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CTM trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CSPI trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -72.31. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CSPI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ALYA's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while VEEAW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VEEAW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while GLE trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 146.50. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GLE's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while GMM trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GMM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while VEEA trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VEEA's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while DVLT trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DVLT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while BTCM trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BTCM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while USIO trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check USIO's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while DTST trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 256.25. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DTST's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while WYY trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WYY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CLPS trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -19.98. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CLPS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while JFU trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check JFU's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while MASK trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check MASK's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CYCU trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CYCU's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CYCUW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while TDTH trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TDTH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SGLB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while ARBB trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ARBB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while JDZG trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check JDZG's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SASI's ROE of +597.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SASI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while DTSTW trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DTSTW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while WAVD trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WAVD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 29.7B. In comparison, REKRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $252.99, while REKRW trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas REKRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to REKRW's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to REKRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check REKRW's competition here