Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. BRK-A Peers
See (BRK-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A | $740,824.00 | +1.21% | 1.1T | 13.16 | $56,295.67 | N/A |
| BRK-B | $493.75 | +1.03% | 1.1T | 13.16 | $37.51 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.5B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +1.83% |
| AEH | $25.67 | N/A | 52.5B | 19.37 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AED | $25.52 | N/A | 52.2B | 19.26 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.1B | 18.88 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AIG | $87.34 | +2.25% | 50.3B | 21.30 | $4.10 | +1.83% |
| HIG-PG | $24.88 | -0.16% | 37B | 3.41 | $7.30 | +1.57% |
| SLF | $65.26 | +0.05% | 36.9B | 16.36 | $3.99 | +3.67% |
| HIG | $129.38 | +1.05% | 36.8B | 13.10 | $9.88 | +1.57% |
Stock Comparison
BRK-A vs BRK-B Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while BRK-B trades at $493.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AIG-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AEH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AED Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AED's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AEB Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while AEB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AIG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while AIG trades at $87.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs HIG-PG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while HIG-PG trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs SLF Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while SLF trades at $65.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs HIG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while HIG trades at $129.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGL Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ACGL trades at $95.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGLO Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ACGLO trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs PFG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while PFG trades at $76.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs EQH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while EQH trades at $54.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGLP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs BNT Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while BNT trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs UNMA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while UNMA trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AEG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while AEG trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AIZN Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while AIZN trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ORI Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ORI trades at $37.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGLN Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ACGLN trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs EQH-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while EQH-PA trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PE Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ATH-PE trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ATH-PC trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ESGRO Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ESGRO trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ESGR Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ESGR trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ESGRP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ESGRP trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ATH-PA trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs EQH-PC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while EQH-PC trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs GSHD Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while GSHD trades at $112.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 94.16. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSHD's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PB Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ATH-PB trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs CNO-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while CNO-PA trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PD Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ATH-PD trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs FIHL Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while FIHL trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is -194.44. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs RZC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while RZC trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs IGIC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while IGIC trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ARGD Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ARGD trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs YB Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 683.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while YB trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs WDH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while WDH trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs FGFPP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while FGFPP trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs FGF Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while FGF trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs IGICW Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGICW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while IGICW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ANAT Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ANAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while ANAT trades at $188.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs WTREP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WTREP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $740,824.00, while WTREP trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.16, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.