Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BTU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTU | $16.70 | -3.33% | 2B | 6.18 | $2.70 | +1.80% |
| CNR | $78.14 | -3.23% | 4.1B | 16.15 | $4.84 | +0.26% |
| ARLP | $27.98 | +0.04% | 3.6B | 13.14 | $2.13 | +10.03% |
| HCC | $57.02 | -1.69% | 3B | 28.50 | $2.00 | +0.57% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.71% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +0.37% |
| AMR | $134.31 | -2.74% | 1.8B | 65.86 | $2.04 | N/A |
| NRP | $100.16 | -1.26% | 1.3B | 9.55 | $10.49 | +4.21% |
| METC | $22.54 | -1.27% | 1.2B | -281.75 | -$0.08 | +2.14% |
| METCL | $25.10 | -0.31% | 1.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
BTU vs CNR Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, CNR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while CNR trades at $78.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas CNR's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to CNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check CNR's competition here
BTU vs ARLP Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while ARLP trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check ARLP's competition here
BTU vs HCC Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while HCC trades at $57.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check HCC's competition here
BTU vs CEIX Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEIX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check CEIX's competition here
BTU vs ARCH Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check ARCH's competition here
BTU vs AMR Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while AMR trades at $134.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is 65.86. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check AMR's competition here
BTU vs NRP Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while NRP trades at $100.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check NRP's competition here
BTU vs METC Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while METC trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -281.75. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METC's competition here
BTU vs METCL Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while METCL trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METCL's competition here
BTU vs METCB Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while METCB trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -180.06. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METCB's competition here
BTU vs SXC Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 715.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while SXC trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SXC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check SXC's competition here
BTU vs HNRG Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while HNRG trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNRG's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check HNRG's competition here
BTU vs NC Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 299.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while NC trades at $40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check NC's competition here
BTU vs AREC Comparison July 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.70, while AREC trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 6.18, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AREC's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check AREC's competition here