Byrna Technologies Inc.
Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BYRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYRN | $21.32 | -4.01% | 484M | 33.84 | $0.63 | N/A |
| GE | $269.38 | -0.63% | 285.6B | 38.37 | $7.02 | +0.48% |
| RTX | $156.81 | -0.48% | 209.9B | 34.46 | $4.55 | +1.64% |
| BA | $221.90 | +0.03% | 167.8B | -13.41 | -$16.55 | N/A |
| LMT | $421.01 | +0.01% | 98.3B | 23.60 | $17.84 | +3.09% |
| TDG | $1,585.00 | -1.46% | 89B | 53.42 | $29.66 | +4.76% |
| NOC | $586.44 | +1.70% | 84B | 21.65 | $27.09 | +1.45% |
| GD | $310.74 | -0.28% | 83.6B | 20.87 | $14.89 | +1.88% |
| AXON | $742.47 | -1.72% | 57.8B | 180.21 | $4.12 | N/A |
| LHX | $278.26 | +1.25% | 52.1B | 31.05 | $8.96 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
BYRN vs GE Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 285.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while GE trades at $269.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 38.37. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check GE's competition here
BYRN vs RTX Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 209.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while RTX trades at $156.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check RTX's competition here
BYRN vs BA Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 167.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while BA trades at $221.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas BA's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BA's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check BA's competition here
BYRN vs LMT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LMT has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LMT trades at $421.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LMT's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LMT's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to LMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LMT's competition here
BYRN vs TDG Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while TDG trades at $1,585.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 53.42. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check TDG's competition here
BYRN vs NOC Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while NOC trades at $586.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check NOC's competition here
BYRN vs GD Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while GD trades at $310.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check GD's competition here
BYRN vs AXON Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while AXON trades at $742.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 180.21. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check AXON's competition here
BYRN vs LHX Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LHX trades at $278.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LHX's competition here
BYRN vs HEI Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while HEI trades at $325.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 76.03. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check HEI's competition here
BYRN vs HEI-A Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while HEI-A trades at $257.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 60.16. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check HEI-A's competition here
BYRN vs ESLT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ESLT trades at $465.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 59.01. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ESLT's competition here
BYRN vs RKLB Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while RKLB trades at $44.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -109.29. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check RKLB's competition here
BYRN vs CW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while CW trades at $493.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check CW's competition here
BYRN vs WWD Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while WWD trades at $259.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check WWD's competition here
BYRN vs TXT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while TXT trades at $77.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check TXT's competition here
BYRN vs BWXT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while BWXT trades at $149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 47.60. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check BWXT's competition here
BYRN vs AVAV Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while AVAV trades at $260.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is 167.79. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AVAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check AVAV's competition here
BYRN vs DRS Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while DRS trades at $41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 44.33. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check DRS's competition here
BYRN vs HII Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while HII trades at $269.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check HII's competition here
BYRN vs ERJ Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ERJ trades at $56.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ERJ's competition here
BYRN vs KTOS Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while KTOS trades at $56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 436.23. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check KTOS's competition here
BYRN vs SARO Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SARO trades at $27.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 132.67. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SARO's competition here
BYRN vs CAE Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while CAE trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check CAE's competition here
BYRN vs LOAR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LOAR trades at $71.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 187.74. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LOAR's competition here
BYRN vs KRMN Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while KRMN trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 1255.50. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check KRMN's competition here
BYRN vs MOG-B Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while MOG-B trades at $202.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check MOG-B's competition here
BYRN vs ACHR-WT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ACHR-WT trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ACHR-WT's competition here
BYRN vs ACHR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ACHR trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ACHR's competition here
BYRN vs MOG-A Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while MOG-A trades at $191.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check MOG-A's competition here
BYRN vs HXL Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while HXL trades at $59.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 55.15. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check HXL's competition here
BYRN vs AJRD Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check AJRD's competition here
BYRN vs SPR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SPR trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SPR's competition here
BYRN vs MRCY Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while MRCY trades at $52.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check MRCY's competition here
BYRN vs VSEC Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while VSEC trades at $146.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 52.24. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check VSEC's competition here
BYRN vs POWWP Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while POWWP trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 81.32. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check POWWP's competition here
BYRN vs AIR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while AIR trades at $72.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 208.60. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check AIR's competition here
BYRN vs TGI Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while TGI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check TGI's competition here
BYRN vs RDW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while RDW trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RDW's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check RDW's competition here
BYRN vs EVEX-WT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check EVEX-WT's competition here
BYRN vs EVEX Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while EVEX trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check EVEX's competition here
BYRN vs PL Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while PL trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check PL's competition here
BYRN vs PL-WT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while PL-WT trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check PL-WT's competition here
BYRN vs VVX Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while VVX trades at $47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check VVX's competition here
BYRN vs LUNR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LUNR trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LUNR's competition here
BYRN vs DCO Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while DCO trades at $89.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check DCO's competition here
BYRN vs CDRE Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while CDRE trades at $32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check CDRE's competition here
BYRN vs KAMN Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check KAMN's competition here
BYRN vs ATRO Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ATRO trades at $34.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -311.45. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ATRO's competition here
BYRN vs VEC Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check VEC's competition here
BYRN vs SKYH Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 716.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SKYH trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SKYH's competition here
BYRN vs NPK Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 682.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while NPK trades at $95.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check NPK's competition here
BYRN vs EH Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 608.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while EH trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -34.49. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check EH's competition here
BYRN vs EVTL Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 561.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while EVTL trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check EVTL's competition here
BYRN vs RGR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 513.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while RGR trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 96.24. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check RGR's competition here
BYRN vs TATT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 432.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while TATT trades at $34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check TATT's competition here
BYRN vs PKE Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 354.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while PKE trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check PKE's competition here
BYRN vs AZ Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, AZ has a market cap of 353.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while AZ trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas AZ's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AZ's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to AZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check AZ's competition here
BYRN vs SWBI Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SWBI trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SWBI's competition here
BYRN vs ISSC Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 273M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ISSC trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ISSC's competition here
BYRN vs SPCE Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SPCE trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SPCE's competition here
BYRN vs POWW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while POWW trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check POWW's competition here
BYRN vs IVAC Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check IVAC's competition here
BYRN vs CODA Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while CODA trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check CODA's competition here
BYRN vs OPXS Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while OPXS trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check OPXS's competition here
BYRN vs VTSI Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while VTSI trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VTSI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check VTSI's competition here
BYRN vs HOVR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while HOVR trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check HOVR's competition here
BYRN vs LLAP Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LLAP's competition here
BYRN vs HOVRW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while HOVRW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check HOVRW's competition here
BYRN vs LLAP-WT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LLAP-WT's competition here
BYRN vs CVU Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while CVU trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CVU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check CVU's competition here
BYRN vs SKYH-WT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SKYH-WT trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SKYH-WT's competition here
BYRN vs LILM Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LILM's ROE of +11.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LILM's competition here
BYRN vs KITT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while KITT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KITT's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check KITT's competition here
BYRN vs XTIA Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while XTIA trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check XTIA's competition here
BYRN vs KITTW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while KITTW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check KITTW's competition here
BYRN vs SIF Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SIF trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SIF's competition here
BYRN vs DPRO Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while DPRO trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -7.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check DPRO's competition here
BYRN vs PRZO Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while PRZO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -7.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check PRZO's competition here
BYRN vs SIDU Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while SIDU trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check SIDU's competition here
BYRN vs GPUS Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while GPUS trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check GPUS's competition here
BYRN vs AIRI Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while AIRI trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check AIRI's competition here
BYRN vs ASTR Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASTR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ASTR's competition here
BYRN vs MNTS Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while MNTS trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check MNTS's competition here
BYRN vs MNTSW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, MNTSW has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while MNTSW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas MNTSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MNTSW's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to MNTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check MNTSW's competition here
BYRN vs ASTC Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while ASTC trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check ASTC's competition here
BYRN vs AULT Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AULT's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check AULT's competition here
BYRN vs KWESW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check KWESW's competition here
BYRN vs KWE Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while KWE trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KWE's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check KWE's competition here
BYRN vs LILMW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LILMW's ROE of +11.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check LILMW's competition here
BYRN vs VORBW Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, VORBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while VORBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas VORBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VORBW's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to VORBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check VORBW's competition here
BYRN vs VORB Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, VORB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while VORB trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas VORB's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VORB's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to VORB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check VORB's competition here
BYRN vs NILE Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, NILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while NILE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas NILE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NILE's ROE of +5.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is less volatile compared to NILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check NILE's competition here
BYRN vs RADA Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, RADA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while RADA trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas RADA's P/E ratio is 89.73. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RADA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to RADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check RADA's competition here
BYRN vs FLY Comparison August 2025
BYRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYRN stands at 484M. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYRN is priced at $21.32, while FLY trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYRN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.84, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYRN's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYRN is more volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYRN.Check FLY's competition here