Canon Inc.
Canon Inc. CAJPY Peers
See (CAJPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | $29.44 | +1.13% | 27.2B | 23.37 | $1.26 | +3.11% |
| QUCCF | $14.51 | +18.45% | 433.9B | 12.09 | $1.20 | N/A |
| CAJFF | $30.50 | +1.67% | 28.2B | 24.21 | $1.26 | +3.19% |
| LNVGY | $23.06 | -0.90% | 14.6B | 11.25 | $2.05 | +4.17% |
| LNVGF | $1.17 | +1.74% | 14.5B | 10.64 | $0.11 | +4.20% |
| SEKEF | $17.55 | +47.48% | 5.6B | 15.00 | $1.17 | +2.87% |
| SEKEY | $6.35 | +0.79% | 4.1B | 10.95 | $0.58 | +3.28% |
| ASUUY | $98.50 | -0.19% | 2.9B | 11.35 | $8.68 | +2.62% |
| LGNRF | $1.13 | N/A | 2.7B | -4.52 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| FXCOF | $1.76 | N/A | 2.5B | 17.60 | $0.10 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
CAJPY vs QUCCF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 433.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while QUCCF trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CAJFF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CAJFF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs LNVGY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, LNVGY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while LNVGY trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas LNVGY's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNVGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to LNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs LNVGF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while LNVGF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SEKEF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SEKEF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SEKEY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SEKEY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs ASUUY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while ASUUY trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs LGNRF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while LGNRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs FXCOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TSHTY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TSHTY trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs DRSHF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while DRSHF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 123.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs ACEYY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 597.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while ACEYY trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs WACMY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 596.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while WACMY trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs WACMF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 534.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while WACMF trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs PCPPF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 469.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while PCPPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs JFEYF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while JFEYF trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs PRWYF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while PRWYF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs AOMUF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TBIIF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TBIIF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SCTQ Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs FRIIF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while FRIIF trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TAKOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TAKOF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs XAARF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while XAARF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CREAF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CREAF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs AOTOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs AITX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while AITX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs DWDZF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while DWDZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs EVRC Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while EVRC trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CCUR Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CCUR trades at $2,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VIDE Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VIDE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -40.05. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIDE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VRTK Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VRTK trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs FNTTF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while FNTTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TKSTF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs RDRSF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while RDRSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs YRLLF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while YRLLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs NADA Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while NADA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NADA's ROE of -8.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs JLMKF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs DDDX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 538.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs ITOX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 504.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CRTG Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 179.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CRTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs HAUP Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs GOSY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOSY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs MCZAF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 36.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs MDEA Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 13.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDEA's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SNIOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VOIS Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 8.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VMRI Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs EUOT Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EUOT's ROE of +28.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CBEX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBEX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SOSO Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOSO's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs IWRS Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.2B. In comparison, IWRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while IWRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.37, whereas IWRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IWRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to IWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.