Code Chain New Continent Limited
Code Chain New Continent Limited (CCNC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCNC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCNC | $3.02 | +7.68% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NTES | $135.48 | -0.60% | 86.1B | 19.33 | $7.01 | +2.04% |
| RBLX | $118.82 | +0.59% | 80.6B | -89.34 | -$1.33 | N/A |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | N/A |
| TTWO | $224.75 | -0.44% | 39.9B | -8.79 | -$25.58 | N/A |
| EA | $151.68 | -0.63% | 38.1B | 35.77 | $4.24 | +0.50% |
| BILI | $23.37 | -2.16% | 9.7B | -116.82 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| PLTK | $4.67 | -1.89% | 1.8B | 12.29 | $0.38 | +8.67% |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| GCL | $4.08 | +8.51% | 515.2M | -408.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCNC vs NTES Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while NTES trades at $135.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check NTES's competition here
CCNC vs RBLX Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while RBLX trades at $118.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -89.34. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check RBLX's competition here
CCNC vs ATVI Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check ATVI's competition here
CCNC vs TTWO Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, TTWO has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while TTWO trades at $224.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTWO's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to TTWO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to TTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check TTWO's competition here
CCNC vs EA Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while EA trades at $151.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check EA's competition here
CCNC vs BILI Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while BILI trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is -116.82. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to BILI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check BILI's competition here
CCNC vs PLTK Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while PLTK trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check PLTK's competition here
CCNC vs AVID Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check AVID's competition here
CCNC vs GCL Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 515.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GCL trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is -408.00. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GCL's competition here
CCNC vs SCPL Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check SCPL's competition here
CCNC vs DDI Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while DDI trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check DDI's competition here
CCNC vs SOHU Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 473.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while SOHU trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check SOHU's competition here
CCNC vs GRVY Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 435.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GRVY trades at $62.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GRVY's competition here
CCNC vs GCLWW Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 418.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GCLWW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GCLWW's competition here
CCNC vs GMGI Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GMGI trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -164.00. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GMGI's competition here
CCNC vs GDEV Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GDEV trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GDEV's competition here
CCNC vs MYPSW Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 157.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while MYPSW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check MYPSW's competition here
CCNC vs MYPS Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while MYPS trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check MYPS's competition here
CCNC vs SKLZ Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while SKLZ trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check SKLZ's competition here
CCNC vs BRAG Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while BRAG trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check BRAG's competition here
CCNC vs GAME Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GAME trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GAME's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GAME's competition here
CCNC vs GMHS Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GMHS trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GMHS's competition here
CCNC vs GDC Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GDC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GDC's ROE of -5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GDC's competition here
CCNC vs NCTY Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while NCTY trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check NCTY's competition here
CCNC vs SNAL Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while SNAL trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to SNAL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check SNAL's competition here
CCNC vs MSGM Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while MSGM trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to MSGM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check MSGM's competition here
CCNC vs TBH Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while TBH trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to TBH's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check TBH's competition here
CCNC vs GIGM Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GIGM trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GIGM's competition here
CCNC vs BHAT Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while BHAT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check BHAT's competition here
CCNC vs MGAM Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while MGAM trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check MGAM's competition here
CCNC vs GXAI Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GXAI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GXAI's competition here
CCNC vs TRUG Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while TRUG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to TRUG's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check TRUG's competition here
CCNC vs NFTG Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check NFTG's competition here
CCNC vs GDEVW Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 348.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GDEVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check GDEVW's competition here
CCNC vs GGL Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CCNC has daily volatility of 10.74 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here
CCNC vs ZNGA Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check ZNGA's competition here
CCNC vs SCR Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check SCR's competition here
CCNC vs YVR Comparison July 2025
CCNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCNC stands at 0. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCNC is priced at $3.02, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CCNC's ROE is -4.15%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCNC is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCNC.Check YVR's competition here