Colgate-Palmolive Company
Colgate-Palmolive Company CL Peers
See (CL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL | $90.22 | +0.08% | 73.1B | 25.56 | $3.53 | +2.23% |
| PG | $163.98 | +0.72% | 384.5B | 25.99 | $6.31 | +2.49% |
| UL | $63.02 | -0.08% | 154.7B | 24.05 | $2.62 | +3.08% |
| KMB | $133.55 | -1.29% | 44.3B | 18.19 | $7.34 | +4.62% |
| KVUE | $21.73 | +0.35% | 41.7B | 38.79 | $0.56 | +3.76% |
| EL | $68.46 | +1.50% | 24.6B | -28.29 | -$2.42 | +2.50% |
| CHD | $99.07 | +0.08% | 24.4B | 42.52 | $2.33 | +1.17% |
| CLX | $127.68 | +0.30% | 15.7B | 22.88 | $5.58 | +3.82% |
| SGI | $65.44 | +0.94% | 13.6B | 41.95 | $1.56 | +0.46% |
| HIMS | $56.39 | +6.86% | 12.1B | 82.92 | $0.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CL vs PG Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 384.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while PG trades at $163.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs UL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 154.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while UL trades at $63.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs KMB Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while KMB trades at $133.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs KVUE Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while KVUE trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 38.79. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while EL trades at $68.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -28.29. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs CHD Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while CHD trades at $99.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs CLX Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while CLX trades at $127.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SGI Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while SGI trades at $65.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs HIMS Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while HIMS trades at $56.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 82.92. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs ELF Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while ELF trades at $117.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 61.28. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NTCO Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs IPAR Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while IPAR trades at $137.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs COTY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while COTY trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NWL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while NWL trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SPB Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while SPB trades at $55.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EPC Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while EPC trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs HELE Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 642.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while HELE trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs PHH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 470.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while PHH trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 892.00. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NUS Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while NUS trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SLSN Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 269.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while SLSN trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 76.80. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EWCZ Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 252.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while EWCZ trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SKIN Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while SKIN trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs ACU Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while ACU trades at $39.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs GROV Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while GROV trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs UG Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while UG trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs RAY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while RAY trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs MTEX Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while MTEX trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -90.82. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs BRSH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs DSY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while DSY trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 132.10. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs TANH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while TANH trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs TKLF Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while TKLF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs BRSHW Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs REV Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SUMR Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.1B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.22, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.