Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF Peers
See (CLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLF | $10.91 | -3.19% | 5.4B | -3.20 | -$3.41 | N/A |
| NUE | $141.43 | -2.46% | 32.6B | 24.95 | $5.67 | +1.55% |
| MT | $33.59 | -3.42% | 25.6B | 21.39 | $1.57 | +1.44% |
| STLD | $126.83 | -2.98% | 18.8B | 18.41 | $6.89 | +1.51% |
| PKX | $60.07 | -1.77% | 18.2B | 30.36 | $1.98 | +1.75% |
| RS | $301.33 | -12.32% | 15.8B | 21.81 | $13.82 | +1.53% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| TX | $31.43 | -1.29% | 6.2B | -17.45 | -$1.80 | +8.57% |
| GGB | $3.10 | -0.32% | 5.9B | 11.09 | $0.28 | +3.44% |
| CMC | $51.91 | -4.28% | 5.8B | 173.00 | $0.30 | +1.38% |
Stock Comparison
CLF vs NUE Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while NUE trades at $141.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MT Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while MT trades at $33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs STLD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while STLD trades at $126.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs PKX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while PKX trades at $60.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs RS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while RS trades at $301.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs X Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs TX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while TX trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -17.45. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs GGB Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while GGB trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs CMC Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while CMC trades at $51.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 173.00. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SID Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while SID trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs WS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while WS trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SIM Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while SIM trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SCHN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs TMST Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs RDUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 705.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while MTUS trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -34.24. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ASTL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 631.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while ASTL trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs USAP Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MSB Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while MSB trades at $28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ZEUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 365.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while ZEUS trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SYNL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ACNT Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while ACNT trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs LUD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while LUD trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -295.50. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs FRD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while FRD trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs KBSX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while KBSX trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs HLP Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while HLP trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ASTLW Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while ASTLW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs HUDI Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while HUDI trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 128.50. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ZKIN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while ZKIN trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs INHD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while INHD trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs OSN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTL-P Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $10.91, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.