Constellation Software Inc.
Constellation Software Inc. (CNSWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNSWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNSWF | $3,407.56 | +0.00% | 69.1B | 107.47 | $30.33 | +0.12% |
| SAPGF | $275.90 | +0.00% | 323.9B | 43.05 | $6.46 | +0.96% |
| INVUP | $26.01 | +0.00% | 48.3B | -1734.00 | -$0.02 | +12.50% |
| DASTY | $30.90 | +0.00% | 41.3B | 31.59 | $0.99 | +0.96% |
| DASTF | $30.08 | +0.00% | 39.8B | 30.82 | $0.98 | +0.89% |
| DIDIY | $5.68 | +0.00% | 26B | 69.88 | $0.08 | N/A |
| WIGBY | $74.75 | -3.69% | 24.8B | 122.54 | $0.61 | +0.17% |
| WTCHF | $73.00 | +0.00% | 24.2B | 119.67 | $0.61 | +0.18% |
| XROLF | $109.98 | +0.00% | 18.9B | 131.44 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NEMTF | $162.73 | +0.00% | 18.8B | 85.65 | $1.90 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
CNSWF vs SAPGF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 323.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SAPGF trades at $275.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SAPGF's competition here
CNSWF vs INVUP Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while INVUP trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1734.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check INVUP's competition here
CNSWF vs DASTY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while DASTY trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check DASTY's competition here
CNSWF vs DASTF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while DASTF trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check DASTF's competition here
CNSWF vs DIDIY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while DIDIY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 69.88. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check DIDIY's competition here
CNSWF vs WIGBY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while WIGBY trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 122.54. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check WIGBY's competition here
CNSWF vs WTCHF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while WTCHF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 119.67. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check WTCHF's competition here
CNSWF vs XROLF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while XROLF trades at $109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 131.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check XROLF's competition here
CNSWF vs NEMTF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NEMTF trades at $162.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 85.65. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NEMTF's competition here
CNSWF vs NEMKY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NEMKY trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NEMKY's competition here
CNSWF vs OBIIF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while OBIIF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check OBIIF's competition here
CNSWF vs SGPYY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SGPYY trades at $59.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SGPYY's competition here
CNSWF vs SGGEF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SGGEF trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SGGEF's competition here
CNSWF vs OCLCF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while OCLCF trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check OCLCF's competition here
CNSWF vs NCSYF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NCSYF trades at $148.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NCSYF's competition here
CNSWF vs KGDEY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while KGDEY trades at $218.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -2430.56. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check KGDEY's competition here
CNSWF vs LIFX Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while LIFX trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 174.77. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check LIFX's competition here
CNSWF vs ALMFF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ALMFF's competition here
CNSWF vs TMSNY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TMSNY trades at $88.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TMSNY's competition here
CNSWF vs TMNSF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TMNSF trades at $91.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TMNSF's competition here
CNSWF vs FNOXF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check FNOXF's competition here
CNSWF vs HOILF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check HOILF's competition here
CNSWF vs THNOF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check THNOF's competition here
CNSWF vs ASOZF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ASOZF's competition here
CNSWF vs SMCYY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SMCYY's competition here
CNSWF vs SRBEF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SRBEF trades at $250.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -125.19. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SRBEF's competition here
CNSWF vs KXSCF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while KXSCF trades at $142.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 168.45. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check KXSCF's competition here
CNSWF vs SICRF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SICRF's competition here
CNSWF vs ASOZY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ASOZY's competition here
CNSWF vs UBMRF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check UBMRF's competition here
CNSWF vs KHOTF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check KHOTF's competition here
CNSWF vs SWONF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SWONF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -790.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWONF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SWONF's competition here
CNSWF vs TMVWY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TMVWY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TMVWY's competition here
CNSWF vs BCTCF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while BCTCF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check BCTCF's competition here
CNSWF vs ESKEF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ESKEF's competition here
CNSWF vs IDXAF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, IDXAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while IDXAF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas IDXAF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IDXAF's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IDXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check IDXAF's competition here
CNSWF vs VOBIF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while VOBIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 65.70. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check VOBIF's competition here
CNSWF vs FREKF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while FREKF trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check FREKF's competition here
CNSWF vs TMVWF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TMVWF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TMVWF's competition here
CNSWF vs TMOAY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TMOAY trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TMOAY's competition here
CNSWF vs IPEU Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check IPEU's competition here
CNSWF vs WEMXF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check WEMXF's competition here
CNSWF vs MAGTF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check MAGTF's competition here
CNSWF vs QTGPF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while QTGPF trades at $52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check QTGPF's competition here
CNSWF vs MVVYF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MVVYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while MVVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas MVVYF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MVVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to MVVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check MVVYF's competition here
CNSWF vs ZEUCF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ZEUCF's competition here
CNSWF vs KNNNF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while KNNNF trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check KNNNF's competition here
CNSWF vs LTTHF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check LTTHF's competition here
CNSWF vs GBGPF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 953.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check GBGPF's competition here
CNSWF vs ESIGF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ESIGF's competition here
CNSWF vs EGHSF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 883.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while EGHSF trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check EGHSF's competition here
CNSWF vs BHPA Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check BHPA's competition here
CNSWF vs BTRCF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while BTRCF trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check BTRCF's competition here
CNSWF vs NPACY Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 763.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NPACY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NPACY's competition here
CNSWF vs TMOAF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TMOAF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TMOAF's competition here
CNSWF vs SLVFF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SLVFF's competition here
CNSWF vs TTMZF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 652.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TTMZF's competition here
CNSWF vs XMMRF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check XMMRF's competition here
CNSWF vs NPACF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NPACF's competition here
CNSWF vs PXPHF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check PXPHF's competition here
CNSWF vs NXLLF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NXLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NXLLF's competition here
CNSWF vs RWWI Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 487.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while RWWI trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check RWWI's competition here
CNSWF vs NSWEF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NSWEF's competition here
CNSWF vs BRDLF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check BRDLF's competition here
CNSWF vs BVSFF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check BVSFF's competition here
CNSWF vs IQGLF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check IQGLF's competition here
CNSWF vs CHNVF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check CHNVF's competition here
CNSWF vs TCYSF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TCYSF trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 123.45. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TCYSF's competition here
CNSWF vs LCHTF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while LCHTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check LCHTF's competition here
CNSWF vs ABXXF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 385.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ABXXF trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ABXXF's competition here
CNSWF vs BLKLF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 383.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while BLKLF trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -64.86. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check BLKLF's competition here
CNSWF vs CMDXF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 376.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while CMDXF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check CMDXF's competition here
CNSWF vs RPGHF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check RPGHF's competition here
CNSWF vs PSSWF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check PSSWF's competition here
CNSWF vs RTME Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check RTME's competition here
CNSWF vs ELMFF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check ELMFF's competition here
CNSWF vs JAPPF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check JAPPF's competition here
CNSWF vs DOTDF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while DOTDF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check DOTDF's competition here
CNSWF vs PLDIF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while PLDIF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check PLDIF's competition here
CNSWF vs RLLMF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while RLLMF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -67.17. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check RLLMF's competition here
CNSWF vs IVUFF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check IVUFF's competition here
CNSWF vs CIGMF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check CIGMF's competition here
CNSWF vs EXMXF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check EXMXF's competition here
CNSWF vs MCAP Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while MCAP trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check MCAP's competition here
CNSWF vs LOQPF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check LOQPF's competition here
CNSWF vs BAINF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 261.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while BAINF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 113.50. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check BAINF's competition here
CNSWF vs SMTEF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SMTEF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SMTEF's competition here
CNSWF vs DAHLF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check DAHLF's competition here
CNSWF vs EXSPF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while EXSPF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check EXSPF's competition here
CNSWF vs FXSRF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check FXSRF's competition here
CNSWF vs FBSFF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check FBSFF's competition here
CNSWF vs WONDF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check WONDF's competition here
CNSWF vs NEOJF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check NEOJF's competition here
CNSWF vs SYZLF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while SYZLF trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -165.94. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check SYZLF's competition here
CNSWF vs CBSZF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check CBSZF's competition here
CNSWF vs FHGDF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, FHGDF has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while FHGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas FHGDF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FHGDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to FHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check FHGDF's competition here
CNSWF vs TCIIF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check TCIIF's competition here
CNSWF vs IARGF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check IARGF's competition here
CNSWF vs DFORF Comparison August 2025
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,407.56, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 107.47, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.Check DFORF's competition here