Carpenter Technology Corporation

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while ATI trades at $94.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ATI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while MLI trades at $88.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MLI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while ESAB trades at $133.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ESAB's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while AZZ trades at $109.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AZZ's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while WOR trades at $61.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check WOR's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while ARNC trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ARNC's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while CMPO trades at $14.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPO's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while CMPOW trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPOW's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 929.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while PRLB trades at $39.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 65.17. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check PRLB's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while HAYN trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HAYN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 729.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while RYI trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -102.95. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check RYI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while IIIN trades at $36.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check IIIN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while NWPX trades at $42.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check NWPX's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while MEC trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MEC's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while TG trades at $9.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -302.33. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TG's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while GIFI trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check GIFI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while MTEN trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MTEN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while AP trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while TPCS trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TPCS's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while TRSG trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TRSG's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while LNKS trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -16.68. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check LNKS's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while HIHO trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is 83.07. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HIHO's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while SGBX trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check SGBX's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP-WT's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while ALPP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ALPP's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.44, while CDSI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.13, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRS has daily volatility of 2.20 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here