Corbion N.V.
Corbion N.V. (CSNVF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSNVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSNVF | $21.04 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 17.67 | $1.29 | +3.16% |
| AIQUY | $40.01 | -1.14% | 115.6B | 29.04 | $1.38 | +1.81% |
| AIQUF | $200.27 | -0.97% | 115.1B | 29.06 | $6.87 | +1.85% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | +0.00% | 50.2B | 32.96 | $1.76 | +0.04% |
| GVDNY | $84.39 | +0.13% | 38.2B | 28.34 | $2.92 | +1.87% |
| GVDBF | $4,476.00 | +0.00% | 37.8B | 28.71 | $142.82 | +1.93% |
| SXYAY | $23.38 | -2.26% | 37.5B | 24.88 | $0.94 | +1.78% |
| SKFOF | $235.00 | -1.28% | 37.4B | 24.91 | $9.36 | +1.73% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 33.8B | 19.52 | $0.02 | +0.09% |
| AKZOY | $21.14 | -3.07% | 33.1B | 23.11 | $0.93 | +3.45% |
Stock Comparison
CSNVF vs AIQUY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while AIQUY trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check AIQUY's competition here
CSNVF vs AIQUF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while AIQUF trades at $200.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check AIQUF's competition here
CSNVF vs PTCAY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and PTCAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTCAY's competition here
CSNVF vs GVDNY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while GVDNY trades at $84.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check GVDNY's competition here
CSNVF vs GVDBF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while GVDBF trades at $4,476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and GVDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GVDBF's competition here
CSNVF vs SXYAY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SXYAY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check SXYAY's competition here
CSNVF vs SKFOF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SKFOF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check SKFOF's competition here
CSNVF vs PTPIF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and PTPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTPIF's competition here
CSNVF vs AKZOY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while AKZOY trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check AKZOY's competition here
CSNVF vs NVZMF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while NVZMF trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 59.03. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and NVZMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVZMF's competition here
CSNVF vs NVZMY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while NVZMY trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 56.70. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check NVZMY's competition here
CSNVF vs EMSHF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and EMSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMSHF's competition here
CSNVF vs NDEKF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while NDEKF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and NDEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDEKF's competition here
CSNVF vs NPCPF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and NPCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPCPF's competition here
CSNVF vs COVTY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while COVTY trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.27. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check COVTY's competition here
CSNVF vs SYIEF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SYIEF trades at $91.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and SYIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYIEF's competition here
CSNVF vs SYIEY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SYIEY trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check SYIEY's competition here
CSNVF vs CVVTF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while CVVTF trades at $69.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -27.32. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and CVVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVVTF's competition here
CSNVF vs AKZOF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and AKZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKZOF's competition here
CSNVF vs CRTSF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check CRTSF's competition here
CSNVF vs CHYHY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check CHYHY's competition here
CSNVF vs BNTGF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while BNTGF trades at $64.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and BNTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNTGF's competition here
CSNVF vs EVKIF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while EVKIF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and EVKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVKIF's competition here
CSNVF vs BNTGY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while BNTGY trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check BNTGY's competition here
CSNVF vs EVKIY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while EVKIY trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check EVKIY's competition here
CSNVF vs IMDZF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and IMDZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMDZF's competition here
CSNVF vs OCLDY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while OCLDY trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 117.17. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and OCLDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCLDY's competition here
CSNVF vs ASGLY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ASGLY trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check ASGLY's competition here
CSNVF vs ASGLF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ASGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGLF's competition here
CSNVF vs NDEKY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while NDEKY trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check NDEKY's competition here
CSNVF vs FUPBY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while FUPBY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check FUPBY's competition here
CSNVF vs FUPEF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and FUPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUPEF's competition here
CSNVF vs SCVUF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and SCVUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCVUF's competition here
CSNVF vs SCVPY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and SCVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCVPY's competition here
CSNVF vs ARKAF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ARKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARKAF's competition here
CSNVF vs FUPPF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and FUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUPPF's competition here
CSNVF vs ARKAY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ARKAY trades at $69.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check ARKAY's competition here
CSNVF vs MITUY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while MITUY trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and MITUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MITUY's competition here
CSNVF vs OCLDF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.83. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and OCLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCLDF's competition here
CSNVF vs COIHF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while COIHF trades at $40.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and COIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COIHF's competition here
CSNVF vs COIHY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while COIHY trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check COIHY's competition here
CSNVF vs KDSKF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check KDSKF's competition here
CSNVF vs HXPLF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while HXPLF trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and HXPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HXPLF's competition here
CSNVF vs JMPLY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while JMPLY trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and JMPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMPLY's competition here
CSNVF vs HXXPY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and HXXPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HXXPY's competition here
CSNVF vs AZLGF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while AZLGF trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and AZLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZLGF's competition here
CSNVF vs WKCMF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while WKCMF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and WKCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WKCMF's competition here
CSNVF vs CLZNF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and CLZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLZNF's competition here
CSNVF vs MITUF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while MITUF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and MITUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MITUF's competition here
CSNVF vs AWTRF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and AWTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWTRF's competition here
CSNVF vs JMPLF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while JMPLF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and JMPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMPLF's competition here
CSNVF vs NOFCF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and NOFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOFCF's competition here
CSNVF vs CLZNY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while CLZNY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check CLZNY's competition here
CSNVF vs MBGCF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while MBGCF trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and MBGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBGCF's competition here
CSNVF vs SASOF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SASOF trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and SASOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SASOF's competition here
CSNVF vs KSANF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and KSANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSANF's competition here
CSNVF vs KPTCY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while KPTCY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and KPTCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPTCY's competition here
CSNVF vs ICPVF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ICPVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICPVF's competition here
CSNVF vs DACHF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while DACHF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and DACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DACHF's competition here
CSNVF vs INCZY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check INCZY's competition here
CSNVF vs LNXSF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while LNXSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and LNXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNXSF's competition here
CSNVF vs LNXSY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while LNXSY trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check LNXSY's competition here
CSNVF vs TKKYY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TKKYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKKYY's competition here
CSNVF vs ZEOOF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ZEOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZEOOF's competition here
CSNVF vs IRLCF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and IRLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRLCF's competition here
CSNVF vs ZEOOY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ZEOOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZEOOY's competition here
CSNVF vs OCINF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while OCINF trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OCINF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and OCINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCINF's competition here
CSNVF vs KPLIF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and KPLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPLIF's competition here
CSNVF vs KANKF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and KANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KANKF's competition here
CSNVF vs BRRDF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and BRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRRDF's competition here
CSNVF vs ELMTY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ELMTY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -38.04. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ELMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMTY's competition here
CSNVF vs ALZCF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ALZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALZCF's competition here
CSNVF vs TKCBF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TKCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKCBF's competition here
CSNVF vs ELKEF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ELKEF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ELKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELKEF's competition here
CSNVF vs TKYMY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TKYMY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TKYMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKYMY's competition here
CSNVF vs TKCBY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TKCBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKCBY's competition here
CSNVF vs EMNSF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while EMNSF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -32.29. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and EMNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMNSF's competition here
CSNVF vs LNTEF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and LNTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNTEF's competition here
CSNVF vs ALPKF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -14.19. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ALPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALPKF's competition here
CSNVF vs CSNVY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and CSNVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSNVY's competition here
CSNVF vs CUYRF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and CUYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUYRF's competition here
CSNVF vs HUIHY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 999.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and HUIHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUIHY's competition here
CSNVF vs TKYMF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 988.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TKYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKYMF's competition here
CSNVF vs FPLSF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 980.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while FPLSF trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check FPLSF's competition here
CSNVF vs DALQF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 917.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and DALQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DALQF's competition here
CSNVF vs AECLY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AECLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and AECLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AECLY's competition here
CSNVF vs VTXPF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 833.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and VTXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTXPF's competition here
CSNVF vs HUABF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 823.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and HUABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUABF's competition here
CSNVF vs SKKAF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and SKKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKKAF's competition here
CSNVF vs HASGF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and HASGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HASGF's competition here
CSNVF vs DLNDY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 778.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while DLNDY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and DLNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLNDY's competition here
CSNVF vs VBVBF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 771M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while VBVBF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check VBVBF's competition here
CSNVF vs ICHMF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ICHMF has a market cap of 756.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while ICHMF trades at $32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ICHMF's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ICHMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and ICHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHMF's competition here
CSNVF vs SYCHF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and SYCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYCHF's competition here
CSNVF vs TITMF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TITMF has a market cap of 640.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TITMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TITMF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TITMF's ROE of -75.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TITMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TITMF's competition here
CSNVF vs TYOBY Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 587.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 166.50. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TYOBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYOBY's competition here
CSNVF vs NOPMF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while NOPMF trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -33.46. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSNVF.Check NOPMF's competition here
CSNVF vs FLRAF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and FLRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRAF's competition here
CSNVF vs TNMAF Comparison August 2025
CSNVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSNVF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSNVF is priced at $21.04, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSNVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, CSNVF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSNVF and TNMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNMAF's competition here