Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Darden Restaurants, Inc. DRI Peers
See (DRI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRI | $202.80 | -2.74% | 23.7B | 22.86 | $8.87 | +2.79% |
| MCD | $294.48 | -1.22% | 210.6B | 25.97 | $11.34 | +2.36% |
| SBUX | $93.70 | -2.31% | 106.5B | 34.07 | $2.75 | +2.56% |
| CMG | $45.74 | -13.34% | 61.7B | 40.49 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $145.83 | -1.33% | 40.5B | 29.06 | $5.02 | +1.88% |
| QSR | $70.02 | -1.57% | 22.9B | 23.73 | $2.95 | +3.40% |
| YUMC | $48.72 | -0.73% | 18.2B | 20.39 | $2.39 | +1.65% |
| DPZ | $476.34 | -0.36% | 16.2B | 27.66 | $17.22 | +1.37% |
| TXRH | $184.19 | -1.23% | 12.2B | 28.38 | $6.49 | +1.40% |
| BROS | $58.46 | -6.93% | 10.1B | 149.89 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DRI vs MCD Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 210.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while MCD trades at $294.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs SBUX Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while SBUX trades at $93.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs CMG Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while CMG trades at $45.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs YUM Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while YUM trades at $145.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs QSR Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while QSR trades at $70.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs YUMC Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while YUMC trades at $48.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs DPZ Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while DPZ trades at $476.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs TXRH Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while TXRH trades at $184.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BROS Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BROS trades at $58.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 149.89. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs CAVA Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while CAVA trades at $86.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 71.90. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs WING Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while WING trades at $299.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 50.19. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs EAT Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while EAT trades at $152.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs SHAK Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while SHAK trades at $133.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 445.40. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs CAKE Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while CAKE trades at $65.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs WEN Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while WEN trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs SG Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while SG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -18.56. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs ARCO Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while ARCO trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs CBRL Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while CBRL trades at $66.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs PZZA Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while PZZA trades at $43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs CNNE Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while CNNE trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs HDL Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while HDL trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs KRUS Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while KRUS trades at $88.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -107.68. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FWRG Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FWRG trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 100.12. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BH-A Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 969.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BH-A trades at $1,529.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BH Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 966.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BH trades at $313.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BJRI Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BJRI trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs TWNPV Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BLMN Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 850.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BLMN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs RUTH Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs PTLO Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 674.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while PTLO trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs CHUY Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs VENU Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while VENU trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs TAST Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs JACK Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while JACK trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs NATH Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while NATH trades at $94.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs PBPB Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 381.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while PBPB trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs DIN Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while DIN trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs RICK Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 339.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while RICK trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs LOCO Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while LOCO trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs TWNP Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while TWNP trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs MB Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while MB trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FRGI Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs DENN Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while DENN trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BBQ Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs RRGB Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while RRGB trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs STKS Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while STKS trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs THCHW Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs THCH Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while THCH trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BDL Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BDL trades at $34.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs GRIL Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FATAV Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FATBW Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FATBB Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FATBB trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs NDLS Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while NDLS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FAT Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FAT trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs RAVE Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while RAVE trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FATBP Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FATBP trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs ARKR Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while ARKR trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs MYT Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs GENK Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while GENK trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -104.50. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs GTIM Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while GTIM trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs REBN Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while REBN trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to REBN's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs YOSH Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while YOSH trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs PC Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while PC trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BTBD Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BTBD trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BTB Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs FATBV Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BTBDW Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs CHSN Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while CHSN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs PNST Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while PNST trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BFI Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs BFIIW Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs ONDR Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.
DRI vs LUB Comparison
DRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DRI stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DRI is priced at $202.80, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DRI currently has a P/E ratio of 22.86, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DRI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DRI is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DRI.