Eni S.p.A.
Eni S.p.A. EIPAF Peers
See (EIPAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIPAF | $16.71 | +0.00% | 50.9B | 18.78 | $0.89 | +4.93% |
| PCCYF | $0.86 | +0.58% | 223.1B | 6.65 | $0.13 | +32.50% |
| RYDAF | $35.37 | -2.84% | 208.9B | 16.15 | $2.19 | +3.97% |
| TTFNF | $61.50 | +0.49% | 137.3B | 10.30 | $5.97 | +5.71% |
| SNPMF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 91.1B | 8.67 | $0.06 | +36.25% |
| BPAQF | $5.06 | +0.80% | 78.9B | -72.21 | -$0.07 | +6.24% |
| OMVKY | $13.34 | -1.84% | 69.8B | 14.36 | $0.93 | +9.88% |
| STOHF | $24.89 | -2.62% | 68.1B | 7.88 | $3.16 | +18.27% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EIPAF vs PCCYF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 223.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PCCYF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RYDAF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 208.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while RYDAF trades at $35.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs TTFNF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while TTFNF trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNPMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while SNPMF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs BPAQF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while BPAQF trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -72.21. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OMVKY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while OMVKY trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs STOHF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while STOHF trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RNFTF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs LUKOY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PETFF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PETFF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GLPEY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while GLPEY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PUTRY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PUTRY trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PUTRF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PUTRF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PSKOF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PSKOF trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OMVJF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while OMVJF trades at $53.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs REPYY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while REPYY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs REPYF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while REPYF trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GLPEF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while GLPEF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OGFGY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while OGFGY trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OGFGF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while OGFGF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs MGYOY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while MGYOY trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OAOFY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SLTQY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs HLPMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while HLPMF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs ISRMF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RTEXF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs WDGJY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs UNTCW Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 290.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while UNTCW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs WDGJF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 280.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while WDGJF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs UNTC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 250.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while UNTC trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PXPEF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SEGYY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs ECTM Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while ECTM trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OKMN Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs GRGUF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs POGS Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 698.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while POGS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs AEDC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs TRNX Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PEMC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNVP Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs FRMC Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs PGAS Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs BNXR Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs AMNE Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs NUSPQ Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs RRRI Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SGTZY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs POGWY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs VCOGF Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs OJSCY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.
EIPAF vs SNPTY Comparison
EIPAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIPAF stands at 50.9B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EIPAF is priced at $16.71, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, EIPAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EIPAF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIPAF.