Eastman Chemical Company
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMN | $78.31 | +1.27% | 9B | 9.97 | $7.85 | +4.22% |
| LIN | $472.89 | +0.30% | 222.6B | 34.34 | $13.77 | +1.22% |
| SHW | $340.10 | -0.03% | 85.2B | 33.74 | $10.08 | +0.89% |
| ECL | $271.75 | +0.71% | 77.1B | 36.94 | $7.36 | +0.93% |
| APD | $299.24 | +0.68% | 66.6B | 43.18 | $6.93 | +2.38% |
| DD | $75.77 | +1.30% | 31.7B | 2526.33 | $0.03 | +2.09% |
| PPG | $115.95 | +0.81% | 26.3B | 20.53 | $5.65 | +2.35% |
| LYB | $64.01 | +5.45% | 20.6B | 22.15 | $2.89 | +8.44% |
| IFF | $76.63 | +0.99% | 19.6B | -23.51 | -$3.26 | +2.09% |
| RPM | $122.78 | +0.11% | 15.8B | 22.93 | $5.35 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
EMN vs LIN Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 222.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while LIN trades at $472.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LIN's competition here
EMN vs SHW Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while SHW trades at $340.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SHW's competition here
EMN vs ECL Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ECL trades at $271.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ECL's competition here
EMN vs APD Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while APD trades at $299.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 43.18. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check APD's competition here
EMN vs DD Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while DD trades at $75.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2526.33. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check DD's competition here
EMN vs PPG Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while PPG trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check PPG's competition here
EMN vs LYB Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while LYB trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LYB's competition here
EMN vs IFF Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while IFF trades at $76.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check IFF's competition here
EMN vs RPM Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while RPM trades at $122.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check RPM's competition here
EMN vs SQM Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while SQM trades at $41.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SQM's competition here
EMN vs WLK Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while WLK trades at $85.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check WLK's competition here
EMN vs ALB Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ALB trades at $83.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ALB's competition here
EMN vs AVTR Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while AVTR trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AVTR's competition here
EMN vs NEU Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while NEU trades at $706.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check NEU's competition here
EMN vs AXTA Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while AXTA trades at $29.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AXTA's competition here
EMN vs ALTM Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ALTM's competition here
EMN vs IKNX Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check IKNX's competition here
EMN vs ESI Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ESI trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ESI's competition here
EMN vs BCPC Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while BCPC trades at $148.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check BCPC's competition here
EMN vs SXT Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while SXT trades at $113.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SXT's competition here
EMN vs CBT Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while CBT trades at $76.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CBT's competition here
EMN vs HWKN Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while HWKN trades at $158.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HWKN's competition here
EMN vs SSL Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while SSL trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SSL's competition here
EMN vs FUL Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while FUL trades at $59.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FUL's competition here
EMN vs AVNT Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while AVNT trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AVNT's competition here
EMN vs LTHM Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LTHM's competition here
EMN vs WDFC Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while WDFC trades at $210.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check WDFC's competition here
EMN vs PRM Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while PRM trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check PRM's competition here
EMN vs OLN Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while OLN trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check OLN's competition here
EMN vs ASH Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ASH trades at $51.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.26. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASH's competition here
EMN vs KWR Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while KWR trades at $122.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KWR's competition here
EMN vs CC Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while CC trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 78.72. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CC's competition here
EMN vs IOSP Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while IOSP trades at $84.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 78.13. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check IOSP's competition here
EMN vs MTX Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while MTX trades at $65.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MTX's competition here
EMN vs PQG Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check PQG's competition here
EMN vs NGVT Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while NGVT trades at $46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check NGVT's competition here
EMN vs SCL Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while SCL trades at $57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SCL's competition here
EMN vs CCF Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CCF's competition here
EMN vs ECVT Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ECVT trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -89.95. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ECVT's competition here
EMN vs REX Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 891.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while REX trades at $54.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check REX's competition here
EMN vs ODC Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 803.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ODC trades at $59.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ODC's competition here
EMN vs KRO Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 706.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while KRO trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KRO's competition here
EMN vs KOP Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 691.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while KOP trades at $34.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KOP's competition here
EMN vs OEC Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while OEC trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check OEC's competition here
EMN vs GPRE Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 542.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while GPRE trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check GPRE's competition here
EMN vs HDSN Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while HDSN trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HDSN's competition here
EMN vs GEVO Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while GEVO trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check GEVO's competition here
EMN vs LWLG Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while LWLG trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LWLG's competition here
EMN vs ADUR Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ADUR trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -37.34. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ADUR's competition here
EMN vs CMT Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while CMT trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CMT's competition here
EMN vs TSE Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while TSE trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check TSE's competition here
EMN vs ALTO Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ALTO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ALTO's competition here
EMN vs NTIC Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while NTIC trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check NTIC's competition here
EMN vs LOOP Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while LOOP trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LOOP's competition here
EMN vs FSI Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while FSI trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FSI's competition here
EMN vs VNTR Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check VNTR's competition here
EMN vs SNES Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while SNES trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SNES's competition here
EMN vs GURE Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while GURE trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check GURE's competition here
EMN vs CNEY Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while CNEY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CNEY's competition here
EMN vs CRKN Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while CRKN trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CRKN's competition here
EMN vs DNMR Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check DNMR's competition here
EMN vs HGAS Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 725.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while HGAS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HGAS's competition here
EMN vs HGASW Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HGASW's competition here
EMN vs MOOV Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EMN has daily volatility of 2.10 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
EMN vs GCP Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check GCP's competition here
EMN vs ZY Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ZY's competition here
EMN vs TREC Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check TREC's competition here
EMN vs AMRS Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AMRS's competition here
EMN vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
EMN vs KRA Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KRA's competition here
EMN vs FOE Comparison July 2025
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 9B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $78.31, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.97, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FOE's competition here