EnerSys
EnerSys ENS Peers
See (ENS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENS | $86.95 | +1.61% | 3.4B | 9.67 | $8.99 | +1.08% |
| ABB | $37.13 | N/A | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $115.37 | +2.81% | 44B | 66.69 | $1.73 | +0.11% |
| HUBB | $395.30 | +1.72% | 21.1B | 26.75 | $14.78 | +1.31% |
| NVT | $68.04 | +2.59% | 11.2B | 47.25 | $1.44 | +1.15% |
| AYI | $270.31 | +1.96% | 8.4B | 20.51 | $13.18 | +0.24% |
| BE | $21.78 | +6.50% | 5.1B | 1089.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| AEIS | $121.56 | +1.60% | 4.6B | 61.71 | $1.97 | +0.33% |
| HAYW | $14.03 | -1.02% | 3B | 25.05 | $0.56 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ENS vs ABB Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs VRT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while VRT trades at $115.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 66.69. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs HUBB Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while HUBB trades at $395.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NVT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while NVT trades at $68.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 47.25. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AYI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while AYI trades at $270.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs BE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while BE trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1089.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs WIRE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AEIS Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while AEIS trades at $121.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs HAYW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while HAYW trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs POWL Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while POWL trades at $190.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ATKR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ATKR trades at $68.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs HOLI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ENR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ENR trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ENVX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ENVX trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs MVST Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while MVST trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PLUG Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while PLUG trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs EOSEW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while EOSEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs EOSE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 945.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while EOSE trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PLPC Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 724.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while PLPC trades at $146.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ADSE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 558.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ADSE trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs KE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while KE trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SES-WT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while SES-WT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs LTBR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while LTBR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AMPX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 349M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while AMPX trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs EAF Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 299.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while EAF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AMPX-WT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 290.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SLDP Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while SLDP trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AIRJ Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while AIRJ trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 46.72. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs FREY Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs TE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while TE trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NVX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 179.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while NVX trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs FCEL Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while FCEL trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SKYX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while SKYX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ELVA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 131.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ELVA trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ULBI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ULBI trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs MVSTW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while MVSTW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SVT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while SVT trades at $46.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.08. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ESP Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ESP trades at $37.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NEOV Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while NEOV trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs CBAT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while CBAT trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs OPTT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while OPTT trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ADSEW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ADSEW trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs RAYA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while RAYA trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs CHEV Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while CHEV trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -55.56. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ELPW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ELPW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs RFIL Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while RFIL trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs IPWR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while IPWR trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SDST Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while SDST trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NEOVW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while NEOVW trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SLDPW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while SLDPW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs APWC Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while APWC trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PPSI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while PPSI trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.19. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs FLUX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while FLUX trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs OESX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while OESX trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs GWH Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while GWH trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs GWH-WT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs CCTG Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while CCTG trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PITA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs STI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while STI trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NXU Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs POLA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while POLA trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SDSTW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while SDSTW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DFLIW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while DFLIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of -20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DFLI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while DFLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFLI's ROE of -20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs XPON Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while XPON trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DCFCW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DCFC Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs BLNKW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ENR-PA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $86.95, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.67, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.