Essex Property Trust, Inc.
Essex Property Trust, Inc. ESS Peers
See (ESS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESS | $279.16 | +0.37% | 19.3B | 26.69 | $10.46 | +3.56% |
| AVB | $203.14 | +0.08% | 28.9B | 25.27 | $8.04 | +3.36% |
| EQR | $68.48 | +0.03% | 26B | 26.34 | $2.60 | +3.96% |
| INVH | $33.17 | +0.68% | 20.3B | 42.52 | $0.78 | +3.44% |
| MAA-PI | $54.85 | +0.62% | 17.9B | 10.65 | $5.15 | +3.98% |
| MAA | $149.86 | +0.02% | 17.5B | 31.15 | $4.81 | +3.98% |
| SUI | $124.50 | -0.23% | 15.9B | 148.21 | $0.84 | +6.25% |
| AMH-PH | $24.06 | -0.08% | 14B | 49.92 | $0.48 | +2.94% |
| AMH-PG | $23.14 | -0.04% | 14B | 48.01 | $0.48 | +2.94% |
| UDR | $41.06 | +0.21% | 13.6B | 114.06 | $0.36 | +4.15% |
Stock Comparison
ESS vs AVB Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AVB trades at $203.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs EQR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while EQR trades at $68.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs INVH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while INVH trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs MAA-PI Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while MAA-PI trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs MAA Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while MAA trades at $149.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs SUI Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while SUI trades at $124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is 148.21. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH-PH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AMH-PH trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 49.92. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH-PG Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AMH-PG trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 48.01. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs UDR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while UDR trades at $41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 114.06. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AMH trades at $36.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CPT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while CPT trades at $115.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 106.30. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs ELS Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while ELS trades at $62.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AIRC Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs MRP Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while MRP trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is -30.70. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs IRT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, IRT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while IRT trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas IRT's P/E ratio is 139.69. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to IRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs UMH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while UMH trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 139.54. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs VRE Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while VRE trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is -43.01. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs UMH-PD Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while UMH-PD trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 110.59. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CSR-PC Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AIV Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AIV trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIV's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CSR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CSR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while CSR trades at $63.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas CSR's P/E ratio is -56.94. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to CSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs NXRT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 854.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while NXRT trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -27.04. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs BRT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while BRT trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs SUNS Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while SUNS trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CLPR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while CLPR trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs BHM Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while BHM trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH-PE Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs BRG-PC Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH-PF Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs BRG-PD Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs ACC Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while ACC trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs BRG Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while BRG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs UMH-PC Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $279.16, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.