Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ABT trades at $126.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ABT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BSX-PA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BSX trades at $106.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 63.20. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BSX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SYK trades at $403.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 54.39. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SYK's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 119.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while MDT trades at $92.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MDT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while DXCM trades at $88.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check DXCM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while PHG trades at $26.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 87.17. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PHG's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while STE trades at $230.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check STE's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while PODD trades at $290.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 52.22. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PODD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ZBH trades at $97.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ZBH's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ABMD trades at $381.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ABMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ALGN trades at $205.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ALGN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SNN trades at $31.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SNN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SWAV trades at $334.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SWAV's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while PEN trades at $233.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 218.00. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PEN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while GMED trades at $54.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check GMED's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BIO trades at $264.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BIO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BIO's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BIO-B trades at $247.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BIO-B's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BRKR trades at $41.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is 80.65. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BRKR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BRKR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while GKOS trades at $94.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -41.55. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check GKOS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while NARI trades at $79.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NARI's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while IRTC trades at $134.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -42.73. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check IRTC's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while INSP trades at $128.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 59.17. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check INSP's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ITGR trades at $108.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 46.55. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ITGR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while TMDX trades at $108.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 76.14. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TMDX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while AXNX trades at $70.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AXNX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while PRCT trades at $55.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -32.97. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PRCT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while LIVN trades at $43.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LIVN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check LIVN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while NUVA trades at $39.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NUVA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while UFPT trades at $241.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check UFPT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ATEC trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ATEC's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CNMD trades at $50.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CNMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SSII trades at $7.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -89.75. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SSII's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SSII's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while AORT trades at $31.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is -61.59. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AORT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AORT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while HSKA trades at $119.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check HSKA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while AHCO trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AHCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AHCO's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ESTA trades at $42.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ESTA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SILK trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SILK's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while FNA trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check FNA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while TNDM trades at $15.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TNDM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while INMD trades at $14.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check INMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while IART trades at $13.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -34.51. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check IART's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CSII trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CSII's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 735.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SIBN trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -27.38. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SIBN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CRY trades at $17.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CRY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CRY's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 716.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while IRMD trades at $56.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check IRMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SMLR trades at $38.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is -15.93. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SMLR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SMLR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 608.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while AXGN trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -83.53. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AXGN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while APEN trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check APEN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 564.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while KIDS trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check KIDS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 555.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while AVNS trades at $12.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AVNS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 546.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CBLL trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CBLL's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 527.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ZIMV trades at $18.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -20.80. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ZIMV's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 514.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SRDX trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SRDX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 487.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BFLY trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BFLY's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BFLY-WT has a market cap of 482.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BFLY-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BFLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BFLY-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BFLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BFLY-WT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 467.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CTKB trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CTKB's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while PACB trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PACB's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PACB's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 441.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while OFIX trades at $11.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check OFIX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 436M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BVS trades at $6.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BVS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BVS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 418.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SENS trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SENS's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SENS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, PTHL has a market cap of 415.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while PTHL trades at $29.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PTHL's P/E ratio is -583.00. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PTHL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PTHL's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 358.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while TMCI trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TMCI's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, NNOX has a market cap of 331.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while NNOX trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NNOX's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NNOX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NNOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NNOX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, OM has a market cap of 328.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while OM trades at $18.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas OM's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to OM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check OM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 325.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while VREX trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check VREX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SNWV trades at $37.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SNWV's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SNWV's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while RXST trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check RXST's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CLPT trades at $11.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -14.78. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CLPT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CATX trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CATX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while NPCE trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NPCE's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 272.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while QTRX trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check QTRX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while MASS trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MASS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CERS trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CERS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while TCMD trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TCMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while VMD trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check VMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, MXCT has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while MXCT trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas MXCT's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MXCT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to MXCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MXCT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while NVRO trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NVRO's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 221.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BWAY trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 53.32. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BWAY's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 217.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while CVRX trades at $8.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CVRX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while EYES trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EYES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check EYES's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while MGRM trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MGRM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while INGN trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check INGN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while SGHT trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SGHT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, RPID has a market cap of 178.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while RPID trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas RPID's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RPID's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RPID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check RPID's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while TLSI trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TLSI's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while PROF trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PROF's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ANIK trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ANIK's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 158.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ELMD trades at $18.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ELMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, LNSR has a market cap of 155.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while LNSR trades at $13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LNSR's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LNSR's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to LNSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check LNSR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, RCEL has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while RCEL trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas RCEL's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RCEL's ROE of -3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to RCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check RCEL's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while BSGM trades at $4.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BSGM's ROE of -35.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BSGM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, OWLT has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while OWLT trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas OWLT's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OWLT's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to OWLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check OWLT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, LUNG has a market cap of 134.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while LUNG trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LUNG's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LUNG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to LUNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check LUNG's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while AVR trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AVR's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AVR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, LUCD has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while LUCD trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LUCD's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LUCD's ROE of +26.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to LUCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check LUCD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, ICAD has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while ICAD trades at $3.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ICAD's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ICAD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ICAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ICAD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, FONR has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while FONR trades at $16.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas FONR's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FONR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to FONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check FONR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 46.9B. In comparison, RBOT-WT has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.00, while RBOT-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas RBOT-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RBOT-WT's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RBOT-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check RBOT-WT's competition here