Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | $177.41 | +2.15% | 2.7B | 19.49 | $9.10 | +0.82% |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTIP | $50.03 | +0.00% | 59.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.72% |
| VTAPX | $25.08 | +0.00% | 59.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.70% |
| VFSUX | $10.44 | +0.00% | 52.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.42% |
| VFSTX | $10.44 | +0.00% | 52.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.32% |
| VGSH | $58.56 | +0.03% | 27.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.16% |
| VSBSX | $19.53 | +0.00% | 27.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.13% |
| VWSTX | $15.83 | +0.00% | 15.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
FAS vs FIYY Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FIYY's competition here
FAS vs FFEU Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FFEU's competition here
FAS vs VTIP Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VTIP trades at $50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VTIP's competition here
FAS vs VTAPX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VTAPX trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VTAPX's competition here
FAS vs VFSUX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VFSUX trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VFSUX's competition here
FAS vs VFSTX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VFSTX trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VFSTX's competition here
FAS vs VGSH Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VGSH trades at $58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VGSH's competition here
FAS vs VSBSX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VSBSX trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VSBSX's competition here
FAS vs VWSTX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VWSTX trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VWSTX's competition here
FAS vs MINT Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while MINT trades at $100.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check MINT's competition here
FAS vs ASBFX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while ASBFX trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check ASBFX's competition here
FAS vs SCHO Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SCHO trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SCHO's competition here
FAS vs PTSHX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while PTSHX trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check PTSHX's competition here
FAS vs FTSM Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FTSM trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FTSM's competition here
FAS vs VFISX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VFISX trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VFISX's competition here
FAS vs SPTS Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SPTS trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SPTS's competition here
FAS vs SPXL Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SPXL trades at $188.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SPXL's competition here
FAS vs TMF Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TMF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TMF's competition here
FAS vs JSDHX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while JSDHX trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check JSDHX's competition here
FAS vs VSGBX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VSGBX trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VSGBX's competition here
FAS vs VSGDX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while VSGDX trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check VSGDX's competition here
FAS vs TECL Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TECL trades at $102.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TECL's competition here
FAS vs FLVCX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FLVCX trades at $44.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FLVCX's competition here
FAS vs BITX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while BITX trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check BITX's competition here
FAS vs TBLL Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TBLL trades at $105.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TBLL's competition here
FAS vs FSTTX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FSTTX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FSTTX's competition here
FAS vs DIAYX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DIAYX trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DIAYX's competition here
FAS vs DHLSX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DHLSX trades at $29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DHLSX's competition here
FAS vs DHFCX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DHFCX's competition here
FAS vs FNGU Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FNGU trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FNGU's competition here
FAS vs PAIAX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while PAIAX trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check PAIAX's competition here
FAS vs DWT Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DWT's competition here
FAS vs ORSTX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check ORSTX's competition here
FAS vs BULZ Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while BULZ trades at $186.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 62.11. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check BULZ's competition here
FAS vs PRFSX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while PRFSX trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check PRFSX's competition here
FAS vs SOXS Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SOXS trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SOXS's competition here
FAS vs ACSNX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while ACSNX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check ACSNX's competition here
FAS vs BASOX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while BASOX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check BASOX's competition here
FAS vs CPLSX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while CPLSX trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check CPLSX's competition here
FAS vs RYCCX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while RYCCX trades at $439.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check RYCCX's competition here
FAS vs RYVLX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while RYVLX trades at $627.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check RYVLX's competition here
FAS vs RYVYX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while RYVYX trades at $626.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check RYVYX's competition here
FAS vs SH Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SH trades at $38.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SH's competition here
FAS vs TAFI Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 789.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TAFI trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TAFI's competition here
FAS vs EXMAX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while EXMAX trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check EXMAX's competition here
FAS vs EMAIX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while EMAIX trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check EMAIX's competition here
FAS vs TUA Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 664.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TUA trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TUA's competition here
FAS vs JSCP Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 650.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while JSCP trades at $47.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check JSCP's competition here
FAS vs NVDX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 648.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while NVDX trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check NVDX's competition here
FAS vs GDXU Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 610.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while GDXU trades at $76.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check GDXU's competition here
FAS vs DPST Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 603M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DPST trades at $96.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DPST's competition here
FAS vs NUGT Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while NUGT trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check NUGT's competition here
FAS vs FNGO Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 564.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FNGO trades at $111.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 38.24. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FNGO's competition here
FAS vs GIYAX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 543M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while GIYAX trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check GIYAX's competition here
FAS vs UVXY Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 538M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while UVXY trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check UVXY's competition here
FAS vs BPRRX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while BPRRX trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check BPRRX's competition here
FAS vs BPIRX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 527.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while BPIRX trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check BPIRX's competition here
FAS vs PSQ Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 520.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while PSQ trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check PSQ's competition here
FAS vs DXQLX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DXQLX trades at $104.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DXQLX's competition here
FAS vs SPXU Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 500.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SPXU trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SPXU's competition here
FAS vs DGAZ Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DGAZ's competition here
FAS vs FSMB Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 468.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FSMB trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FSMB's competition here
FAS vs SDHY Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 411.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SDHY trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SDHY's competition here
FAS vs SPXS Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SPXS trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SPXS's competition here
FAS vs SDS Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SDS trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SDS's competition here
FAS vs GGLL Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while GGLL trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check GGLL's competition here
FAS vs SEMRX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SEMRX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SEMRX's competition here
FAS vs FSHSX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FSHSX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FSHSX's competition here
FAS vs AAPU Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while AAPU trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check AAPU's competition here
FAS vs NAIL Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while NAIL trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check NAIL's competition here
FAS vs KOLD Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while KOLD trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check KOLD's competition here
FAS vs MRRL Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check MRRL's competition here
FAS vs DUST Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DUST trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DUST's competition here
FAS vs JNUG Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 304.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while JNUG trades at $79.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check JNUG's competition here
FAS vs TZA Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 301.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TZA trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TZA's competition here
FAS vs FLGE Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FLGE's competition here
FAS vs DFEN Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while DFEN trades at $59.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check DFEN's competition here
FAS vs MORL Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check MORL's competition here
FAS vs SVXY Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SVXY trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SVXY's competition here
FAS vs SMB Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SMB trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SMB's competition here
FAS vs AMZU Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 273.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while AMZU trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check AMZU's competition here
FAS vs SVIX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SVIX trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SVIX's competition here
FAS vs QID Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while QID trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check QID's competition here
FAS vs STOT Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while STOT trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check STOT's competition here
FAS vs GUSH Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 254.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while GUSH trades at $23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check GUSH's competition here
FAS vs FTSD Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FTSD trades at $90.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FTSD's competition here
FAS vs TENG Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TENG's competition here
FAS vs ERX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 228.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while ERX trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check ERX's competition here
FAS vs UUP Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 212.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while UUP trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check UUP's competition here
FAS vs REML Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check REML's competition here
FAS vs FUMB Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while FUMB trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check FUMB's competition here
FAS vs TWUSX Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TWUSX trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TWUSX's competition here
FAS vs SDOW Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while SDOW trades at $39.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check SDOW's competition here
FAS vs CLSE Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while CLSE trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check CLSE's competition here
FAS vs EMNT Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while EMNT trades at $98.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check EMNT's competition here
FAS vs TMV Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 177M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while TMV trades at $39.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check TMV's competition here
FAS vs CVSB Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while CVSB trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check CVSB's competition here
FAS vs PULT Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PULT has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while PULT trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas PULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PULT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to PULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check PULT's competition here
FAS vs USDU Comparison July 2025
FAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAS is priced at $177.41, while USDU trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.49, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAS is more volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAS.Check USDU's competition here