Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.
Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FDP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDP | $37.16 | +2.23% | 1.8B | 11.91 | $3.12 | +2.97% |
| ADM | $58.56 | +0.48% | 28.1B | 25.47 | $2.30 | +3.44% |
| TSN | $56.44 | -0.42% | 19.7B | 25.65 | $2.20 | +3.55% |
| BG | $82.52 | +0.36% | 16.5B | 8.32 | $9.92 | +3.31% |
| SFD | $24.52 | -2.58% | 9.6B | 10.80 | $2.27 | +2.07% |
| CALM | $107.83 | +0.28% | 5.2B | 4.32 | $24.95 | +7.75% |
| AGRO | $9.15 | -0.44% | 4.6B | 14.52 | $0.63 | +3.79% |
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | N/A |
| VITL | $46.21 | +0.13% | 2.1B | 41.26 | $1.12 | N/A |
| DOLE | $13.91 | +3.42% | 1.3B | 11.68 | $1.19 | +2.34% |
Stock Comparison
FDP vs ADM Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while ADM trades at $58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check ADM's competition here
FDP vs TSN Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while TSN trades at $56.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check TSN's competition here
FDP vs BG Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while BG trades at $82.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check BG's competition here
FDP vs SFD Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while SFD trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check SFD's competition here
FDP vs CALM Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while CALM trades at $107.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check CALM's competition here
FDP vs AGRO Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AGRO trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AGRO's competition here
FDP vs IBA Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check IBA's competition here
FDP vs VITL Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while VITL trades at $46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 41.26. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check VITL's competition here
FDP vs DOLE Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while DOLE trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check DOLE's competition here
FDP vs LND Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 372.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while LND trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check LND's competition here
FDP vs CHSCL Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 353.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while CHSCL trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check CHSCL's competition here
FDP vs CHSCO Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 352.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while CHSCO trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check CHSCO's competition here
FDP vs CHSCM Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while CHSCM trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check CHSCM's competition here
FDP vs CHSCN Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while CHSCN trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check CHSCN's competition here
FDP vs CHSCP Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while CHSCP trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check CHSCP's competition here
FDP vs LMNR Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 287.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while LMNR trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -122.23. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LMNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check LMNR's competition here
FDP vs VFF Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 278.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while VFF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check VFF's competition here
FDP vs ALCO Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while ALCO trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check ALCO's competition here
FDP vs AFRI Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AFRI trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AFRI's competition here
FDP vs AGFS Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AGFS's competition here
FDP vs LOCL Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while LOCL trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check LOCL's competition here
FDP vs PME Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check PME's competition here
FDP vs DTCK Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while DTCK trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTCK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check DTCK's competition here
FDP vs AFRIW Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AFRIW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -20.43. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AFRIW's competition here
FDP vs APPHW Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check APPHW's competition here
FDP vs APPH Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check APPH's competition here
FDP vs EDBLW Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while EDBLW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check EDBLW's competition here
FDP vs SDOT Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while SDOT trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check SDOT's competition here
FDP vs EDBL Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while EDBL trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check EDBL's competition here
FDP vs AGRI Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AGRI trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AGRI's competition here
FDP vs AQB Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AQB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AQB's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AQB's competition here
FDP vs KAL Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check KAL's competition here
FDP vs KALWW Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check KALWW's competition here
FDP vs SANW Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 836.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while SANW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check SANW's competition here
FDP vs AAGR Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 289.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AAGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AAGR's competition here
FDP vs AGRIW Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AGRIW's competition here
FDP vs AAGRW Comparison August 2025
FDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 57.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FDP is priced at $37.16, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDP currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FDP is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDP.Check AAGRW's competition here