Fair Isaac Corporation
Fair Isaac Corporation FICO Peers
See (FICO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICO | $1,776.69 | -2.08% | 43.2B | 76.58 | $23.20 | N/A |
| SAP | $292.61 | -1.09% | 341.4B | 52.25 | $5.60 | +0.90% |
| CRM | $262.63 | -0.47% | 251.1B | 41.16 | $6.38 | +0.62% |
| INTU | $764.74 | -0.43% | 213.3B | 62.63 | $12.21 | +0.53% |
| NOW | $1,004.22 | -0.09% | 208B | 135.52 | $7.41 | N/A |
| UBER | $84.74 | -0.45% | 177.2B | 14.84 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $106.53 | -1.70% | 138.1B | 86.61 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $360.45 | -2.76% | 122B | 65.06 | $5.54 | N/A |
| MSTR | $375.18 | -1.85% | 102.6B | -16.87 | -$22.24 | N/A |
| CDNS | $299.00 | -0.60% | 81.6B | 75.89 | $3.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FICO vs SAP Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 341.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while SAP trades at $292.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CRM Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CRM trades at $262.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs INTU Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 213.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while INTU trades at $764.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs NOW Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 208B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while NOW trades at $1,004.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 135.52. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs UBER Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 177.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while UBER trades at $84.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs SHOP Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while SHOP trades at $106.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 86.61. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO and SHOP have similar daily volatility (2.06).
FICO vs APP Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while APP trades at $360.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 65.06. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs MSTR Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while MSTR trades at $375.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.87. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CDNS Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CDNS trades at $299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 75.89. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs SNOW Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while SNOW trades at $209.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -49.74. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs WDAY Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while WDAY trades at $242.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 134.09. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ADSK Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ADSK trades at $296.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs TEAM Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while TEAM trades at $198.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -120.12. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DDOG Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DDOG trades at $124.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 265.62. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs TTD Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while TTD trades at $67.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 82.51. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ANSS Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ANSS trades at $336.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 50.04. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs HUBS Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while HUBS trades at $554.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1260.65. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs STRK Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while STRK trades at $103.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs TYL Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while TYL trades at $580.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 87.87. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs STRF Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while STRF trades at $102.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ZM Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ZM trades at $77.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DUOL Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DUOL trades at $476.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 236.97. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs GWRE Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while GWRE trades at $248.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 577.38. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PTC Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PTC trades at $167.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.02. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs SSNC Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while SSNC trades at $79.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs GRAB Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while GRAB trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 480.00. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DT trades at $55.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs AZPN Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DOCU Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DOCU trades at $74.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs BSY Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while BSY trades at $50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 64.62. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs MNDY Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while MNDY trades at $289.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 314.57. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PAYC Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PAYC trades at $241.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs BKI Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs QXO Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while QXO trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -57.51. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs MANH Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while MANH trades at $191.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 54.72. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs XM Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CDAY Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs NICE Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while NICE trades at $165.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PCOR Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PCOR trades at $66.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -77.55. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PCTY Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PCTY trades at $176.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs U Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while U trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas U's P/E ratio is -20.99. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs TTAN Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while TTAN trades at $105.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DAY Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DAY trades at $56.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 355.38. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ESTC Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ESTC trades at $84.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -80.87. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PEGA Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PEGA trades at $100.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 46.60. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DSGX Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DSGX trades at $98.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CVLT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CVLT trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 112.57. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs NATI Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs APPF Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while APPF trades at $220.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 41.26. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs SMAR Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs SRAD Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while SRAD trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 130.58. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs OTEX Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while OTEX trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs GTLB Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while GTLB trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 465.22. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CWAN Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CWAN trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs LYFT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while LYFT trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 99.67. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs COUP Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs VERX Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while VERX trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -127.38. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs IDCC Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while IDCC trades at $221.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs QTWO Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while QTWO trades at $85.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -252.82. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ETWO-WT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs BULL Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while BULL trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs LIF Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while LIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 478.62. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs FROG Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while FROG trades at $41.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -58.37. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs FRSH Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while FRSH trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -63.83. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs GRND Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while GRND trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -38.35. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs INTA Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while INTA trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -224.96. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO and INTA have similar daily volatility (2.06).
FICO vs BILL Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while BILL trades at $41.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2092.00. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CVT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PYCR Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs RUM Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while RUM trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PWSC Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ZI Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs SOUN Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while SOUN trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -15.31. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs RUMBW Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while RUMBW trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs WK Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while WK trades at $66.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -57.42. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs AYX Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ENV Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs INST Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs RIOT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while RIOT trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs BL Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while BL trades at $54.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs KC Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while KC trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs NCNO Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while NCNO trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -108.40. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ASAN Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ASAN trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.32. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs COMP Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while COMP trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -45.88. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs AGYS Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while AGYS trades at $109.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 133.38. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CALX Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CALX trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -90.08. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs BRZE Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while BRZE trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -28.11. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ZETA Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ZETA trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -50.22. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs BLKB Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while BLKB trades at $60.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs GBTG Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while GBTG trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -60.25. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DAVEW Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DAVEW trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ALRM Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ALRM trades at $56.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ALIT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ALIT trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -87.42. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs ALKT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while ALKT trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -72.51. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PRGS Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PRGS trades at $63.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 49.59. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DAVE Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DAVE trades at $204.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 57.38. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs DCT Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs PAR Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while PAR trades at $62.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.
FICO vs CLSK Comparison
FICO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $1,776.69, while CLSK trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 76.58, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.