Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. FIS Peers
See (FIS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIS | $81.20 | +0.82% | 42.7B | 51.72 | $1.57 | +1.82% |
| AAPL | $203.92 | +1.64% | 3T | 28.76 | $7.09 | +0.49% |
| SONY | $26.66 | +1.25% | 160.5B | 20.51 | $1.30 | +0.24% |
| LPL | $3.24 | -0.15% | 3.2B | -2.28 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $10.04 | -0.20% | 1.2B | -17.93 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $13.19 | +3.37% | 265.7M | 17.82 | $0.74 | N/A |
| VUZI | $2.97 | +5.32% | 226.4M | -2.88 | -$1.03 | N/A |
| VOXX | $7.50 | N/A | 169M | -2.43 | -$3.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FIS vs AAPL Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while AAPL trades at $203.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs SONY Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 160.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while SONY trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs LPL Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while LPL trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs VZIO Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs SONO Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while SONO trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs HEAR Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs TBCH Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while TBCH trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs VUZI Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while VUZI trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs VOXX Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs BWNB Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while BWNB trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs GPRO Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while GPRO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs BWSN Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while BWSN trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs UEIC Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while UEIC trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs KOSS Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while KOSS trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -70.62. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs AXIL Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while AXIL trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs FOXX Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while FOXX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs FEBO Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while FEBO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs MSN Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while MSN trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs ZEPP Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while ZEPP trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs PXDT Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs MICS Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs RIME Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while RIME trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs UTME Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs WTO Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while WTO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs WLDS Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while WLDS trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.
FIS vs WLDSW Comparison
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 42.7B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $81.20, while WLDSW trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.72, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.