Fluidra, S.A.
Fluidra, S.A. (FLUIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLUIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUIF | $27.00 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 30.00 | $0.90 | +2.19% |
| SMAWF | $247.31 | -4.84% | 197.1B | 21.69 | $11.58 | +2.17% |
| SIEGY | $123.60 | -3.32% | 194B | 21.69 | $5.71 | +1.62% |
| SBGSF | $251.03 | -6.85% | 140.8B | 26.88 | $9.30 | +1.12% |
| SBGSY | $49.65 | -4.98% | 140.1B | 26.75 | $1.86 | +1.69% |
| RCIT | $2,142.87 | +1071434900.00% | 133.3B | -214287.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $114.00 | -2.56% | 90.7B | 456.00 | $0.25 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $113.25 | -2.68% | 90.3B | 472.96 | $0.24 | N/A |
| WRTBY | $5.60 | +0.00% | 82.4B | 25.45 | $0.22 | +1.50% |
| MHVYF | $23.93 | -1.68% | 81.4B | 49.49 | $0.49 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
FLUIF vs SMAWF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SMAWF trades at $247.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SMAWF's competition here
FLUIF vs SIEGY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 194B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SIEGY trades at $123.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SIEGY's competition here
FLUIF vs SBGSF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SBGSF trades at $251.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SBGSF's competition here
FLUIF vs SBGSY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SBGSY trades at $49.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SBGSY's competition here
FLUIF vs RCIT Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while RCIT trades at $2,142.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -214287.00. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check RCIT's competition here
FLUIF vs SMEGF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SMEGF trades at $114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 456.00. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SMEGF's competition here
FLUIF vs SMNEY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SMNEY trades at $113.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 472.96. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SMNEY's competition here
FLUIF vs WRTBY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while WRTBY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check WRTBY's competition here
FLUIF vs MHVYF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while MHVYF trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 49.49. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check MHVYF's competition here
FLUIF vs ATLFF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while ATLFF trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check ATLFF's competition here
FLUIF vs ATLCY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while ATLCY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check ATLCY's competition here
FLUIF vs ATLKY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while ATLKY trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check ATLKY's competition here
FLUIF vs ATLPF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while ATLPF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check ATLPF's competition here
FLUIF vs KNYJY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while KNYJY trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check KNYJY's competition here
FLUIF vs SHLAF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SHLAF trades at $381.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SHLAF's competition here
FLUIF vs SHLRF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SHLRF trades at $358.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SHLRF's competition here
FLUIF vs KNYJF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while KNYJF trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check KNYJF's competition here
FLUIF vs SDVKY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SDVKY trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SDVKY's competition here
FLUIF vs SDVKF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SDVKF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SDVKF's competition here
FLUIF vs WEGZY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while WEGZY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check WEGZY's competition here
FLUIF vs FANUF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while FANUF trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check FANUF's competition here
FLUIF vs FANUY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while FANUY trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check FANUY's competition here
FLUIF vs NNDNF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while NNDNF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check NNDNF's competition here
FLUIF vs SMCAY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SMCAY trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SMCAY's competition here
FLUIF vs NJDCY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while NJDCY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check NJDCY's competition here
FLUIF vs SMECF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SMECF trades at $362.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SMECF's competition here
FLUIF vs WEICF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while WEICF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check WEICF's competition here
FLUIF vs VWSYF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while VWSYF trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check VWSYF's competition here
FLUIF vs VWDRY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while VWDRY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check VWDRY's competition here
FLUIF vs ALFVY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while ALFVY trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check ALFVY's competition here
FLUIF vs IHICY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while IHICY trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check IHICY's competition here
FLUIF vs IHICF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while IHICF trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check IHICF's competition here
FLUIF vs ALFVF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check ALFVF's competition here
FLUIF vs WEICY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check WEICY's competition here
FLUIF vs SIELF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SIELF's competition here
FLUIF vs WRTBF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while WRTBF trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check WRTBF's competition here
FLUIF vs GCTAF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check GCTAF's competition here
FLUIF vs GCTAY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check GCTAY's competition here
FLUIF vs KWHIY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while KWHIY trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check KWHIY's competition here
FLUIF vs KWHIF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while KWHIF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check KWHIF's competition here
FLUIF vs GEAGF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while GEAGF trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check GEAGF's competition here
FLUIF vs VTTGF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while VTTGF trades at $355.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check VTTGF's competition here
FLUIF vs RATIY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check RATIY's competition here
FLUIF vs SMGKF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SMGKF trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SMGKF's competition here
FLUIF vs VACNY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while VACNY trades at $34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check VACNY's competition here
FLUIF vs SMGZY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SMGZY trades at $31.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SMGZY's competition here
FLUIF vs DFKCY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while DFKCY trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check DFKCY's competition here
FLUIF vs DAIUF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while DAIUF trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check DAIUF's competition here
FLUIF vs JPSWY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while JPSWY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check JPSWY's competition here
FLUIF vs MLSPF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while MLSPF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -143.24. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check MLSPF's competition here
FLUIF vs WEIGF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while WEIGF trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check WEIGF's competition here
FLUIF vs RTLLF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while RTLLF trades at $775.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check RTLLF's competition here
FLUIF vs WEGRY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while WEGRY trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check WEGRY's competition here
FLUIF vs TBABF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check TBABF's competition here
FLUIF vs EBCOY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while EBCOY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check EBCOY's competition here
FLUIF vs IMIAF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while IMIAF trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check IMIAF's competition here
FLUIF vs YOKEY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while YOKEY trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check YOKEY's competition here
FLUIF vs VOYJF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while VOYJF trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check VOYJF's competition here
FLUIF vs FCHRF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while FCHRF trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check FCHRF's competition here
FLUIF vs NRXXY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while NRXXY trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 164.38. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check NRXXY's competition here
FLUIF vs SPXSY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SPXSY trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SPXSY's competition here
FLUIF vs SPXSF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SPXSF trades at $82.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SPXSF's competition here
FLUIF vs VLMTY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check VLMTY's competition here
FLUIF vs SULZF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SULZF trades at $177.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SULZF's competition here
FLUIF vs NRDXF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while NRDXF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 156.33. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check NRDXF's competition here
FLUIF vs EBCOF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check EBCOF's competition here
FLUIF vs HAIIF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check HAIIF's competition here
FLUIF vs BCHHF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check BCHHF's competition here
FLUIF vs XJNGF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while XJNGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check XJNGF's competition here
FLUIF vs YOKEF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check YOKEF's competition here
FLUIF vs HSHZY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while HSHZY trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check HSHZY's competition here
FLUIF vs YMATF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check YMATF's competition here
FLUIF vs HSHIF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check HSHIF's competition here
FLUIF vs SFSLF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SFSLF's competition here
FLUIF vs DNGFF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check DNGFF's competition here
FLUIF vs KRNNF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check KRNNF's competition here
FLUIF vs ATSAF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check ATSAF's competition here
FLUIF vs NGKIF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while NGKIF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check NGKIF's competition here
FLUIF vs AALBF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while AALBF trades at $32.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check AALBF's competition here
FLUIF vs MRRLF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check MRRLF's competition here
FLUIF vs MICLF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check MICLF's competition here
FLUIF vs RTOXF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while RTOXF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check RTOXF's competition here
FLUIF vs FLIDY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check FLIDY's competition here
FLUIF vs CYJBF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check CYJBF's competition here
FLUIF vs JGHAF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while JGHAF trades at $36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check JGHAF's competition here
FLUIF vs FLIDF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while FLIDF trades at $56.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check FLIDF's competition here
FLUIF vs THKLY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while THKLY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 59.29. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check THKLY's competition here
FLUIF vs KUKAF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check KUKAF's competition here
FLUIF vs AMDWF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check AMDWF's competition here
FLUIF vs FJTCY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while FJTCY trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check FJTCY's competition here
FLUIF vs KRDXF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while KRDXF trades at $376.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check KRDXF's competition here
FLUIF vs SOHVF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SOHVF's competition here
FLUIF vs THKLF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check THKLF's competition here
FLUIF vs SOHVY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SOHVY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 530.00. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SOHVY's competition here
FLUIF vs MIURF Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check MIURF's competition here
FLUIF vs JGHHY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check JGHHY's competition here
FLUIF vs NCTKY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while NCTKY trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check NCTKY's competition here
FLUIF vs SUZRY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SUZRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while SUZRY trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SUZRY's P/E ratio is 73.22. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUZRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to SUZRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check SUZRY's competition here
FLUIF vs MLSYY Comparison August 2025
FLUIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIF is priced at $27.00, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, FLUIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIF is more volatile compared to MLSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIF.Check MLSYY's competition here