Fabrinet

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while APH trades at $105.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check APH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while TEL trades at $208.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TEL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while GLW trades at $55.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 106.52. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GLW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while GRMN trades at $235.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GRMN's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IIVI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while KEYS trades at $166.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KEYS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while TDY trades at $555.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TDY's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while JBL trades at $222.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check JBL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while TRMB trades at $85.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TRMB's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while CLS trades at $170.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CLS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while FLEX trades at $49.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FLEX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while FTV trades at $51.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FTV's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while COHR trades at $100.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -455.16. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check COHR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MKSI trades at $99.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MKSI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ITRI trades at $135.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ITRI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SNDK trades at $42.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SNDK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while VNT trades at $39.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VNT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while CGNX trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CGNX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while LFUS trades at $230.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 60.46. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LFUS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BMI trades at $193.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BMI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SANM trades at $98.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SANM's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ESE trades at $191.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ESE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ST trades at $32.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ST's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while TTMI trades at $45.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TTMI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while NOVT trades at $127.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 65.24. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NOVT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OSIS trades at $226.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OSIS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while PLXS trades at $123.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PLXS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while VICR trades at $46.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VICR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BELFA trades at $109.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BELFB trades at $119.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFB's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OUST trades at $26.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BHE trades at $38.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BHE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while PENG trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -86.74. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PENG's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while CTS trades at $41.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CTS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ROG trades at $65.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 72.52. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ROG's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FARO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 816.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while DAKT trades at $16.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -79.19. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAKT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 741.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 688.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BKSY trades at $19.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BKSY's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 672.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ALNT trades at $39.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 68.52. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ALNT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 565M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while LYTS trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LYTS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMOT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 458.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while NEON trades at $27.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -73.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NEON's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MLAB trades at $75.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -210.06. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MLAB's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while VPG trades at $28.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 122.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VPG's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SATL trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SATL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SATLW trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SATLW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while KOPN trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -25.62. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KOPN's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MVIS trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MVIS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VLDR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while KULR trades at $6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KULR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MEI trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MEI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check EMAN's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while RELL trades at $10.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -131.62. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check RELL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while LPTH trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LPTH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MPTI trades at $43.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MPTI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BMNR trades at $39.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BMNR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while WBX trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WBX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while GNSS trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GNSS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ODYS trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ODYS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OPTX trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 200.20. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while WRAP trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WRAP's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ELTK trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELTK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MIND trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MIND's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while LINK trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -29.21. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LINK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while REFR trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -44.62. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check REFR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SOTK trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SOTK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while DSWL trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DSWL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while LGL trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 93.88. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LGL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SELX trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SELX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SVRE trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVRE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while CPSH trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CPSH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ISNS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while LUNA trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LUNA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while DAIO trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAIO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while HOLOW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check HOLOW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MTEK trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -20.72. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MTEK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while HOLO trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check HOLO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TMPOW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while NSYS trades at $8.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NSYS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while FCUV trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FCUV's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SGMA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while KNW trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KNW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VIAO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while ELSE trades at $4.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELSE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while WATT trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WATT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OST trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OST's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SLNHP trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNHP's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SLNH trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SVREW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVREW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while SOBR trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SOBR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OUSTZ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUSTZ's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BNSO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MINDP's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while OPTXW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTXW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while IMTE trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IMTE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $308.89, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.41, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MMAT's competition here