Forestar Group Inc.
Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FOR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOR | $25.12 | +0.48% | 1.3B | 7.88 | $3.19 | N/A |
| BEPI | $16.18 | +0.56% | 7.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.35% |
| BEPH | $15.31 | +0.59% | 7.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.35% |
| SDHC | $20.51 | -1.49% | 1.1B | 11.51 | $1.78 | N/A |
| AMBR | $7.26 | -2.29% | 680.1M | -4.54 | -$1.60 | N/A |
| MRNO | $7.92 | -3.43% | 602M | -3.06 | -$2.48 | N/A |
| LSEA | $11.31 | +0.00% | 411.8M | 43.50 | $0.26 | N/A |
| FPH | $5.47 | -14.93% | 382.5M | 4.38 | $1.25 | N/A |
| OZ | $66.00 | +1.15% | 243.5M | -8.45 | -$7.81 | N/A |
| VTMX | $26.64 | +0.45% | 225.9M | 70.05 | $0.38 | +2.60% |
Stock Comparison
FOR vs BEPI Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BEPI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while BEPI trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas BEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEPI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to BEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check BEPI's competition here
FOR vs BEPH Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BEPH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while BEPH trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas BEPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEPH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to BEPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check BEPH's competition here
FOR vs SDHC Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SDHC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while SDHC trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas SDHC's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDHC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SDHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SDHC's competition here
FOR vs AMBR Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMBR has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while AMBR trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas AMBR's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to AMBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AMBR's competition here
FOR vs MRNO Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MRNO has a market cap of 602M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while MRNO trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas MRNO's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRNO's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to MRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check MRNO's competition here
FOR vs LSEA Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LSEA has a market cap of 411.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while LSEA trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas LSEA's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to LSEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LSEA's competition here
FOR vs FPH Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FPH has a market cap of 382.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while FPH trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas FPH's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FPH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to FPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check FPH's competition here
FOR vs OZ Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OZ has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while OZ trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas OZ's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OZ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to OZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check OZ's competition here
FOR vs VTMX Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTMX has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while VTMX trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas VTMX's P/E ratio is 70.05. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VTMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to VTMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check VTMX's competition here
FOR vs ARL Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARL has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while ARL trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas ARL's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to ARL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check ARL's competition here
FOR vs HGSH Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HGSH has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while HGSH trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas HGSH's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGSH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HGSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HGSH's competition here
FOR vs AXR Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AXR has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while AXR trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas AXR's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to AXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AXR's competition here
FOR vs JFB Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JFB has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while JFB trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas JFB's P/E ratio is 713.00. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to JFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check JFB's competition here
FOR vs LRE Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LRE has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while LRE trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas LRE's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to LRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LRE's competition here
FOR vs AEI Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AEI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while AEI trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas AEI's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to AEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AEI's competition here
FOR vs LSEAW Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LSEAW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while LSEAW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas LSEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSEAW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to LSEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LSEAW's competition here
FOR vs GGE Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GGE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while GGE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas GGE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGE's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to GGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check GGE's competition here
FOR vs SGD Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SGD has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while SGD trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas SGD's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGD's ROE of -8.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SGD's competition here
FOR vs XIN Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XIN has a market cap of 805.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while XIN trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas XIN's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XIN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to XIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check XIN's competition here
FOR vs HCDIP Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCDIP has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while HCDIP trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas HCDIP's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDIP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIP's competition here
FOR vs HCDI Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCDI has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while HCDI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas HCDI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDI's competition here
FOR vs HCDIW Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCDIW has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while HCDIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas HCDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIW's competition here
FOR vs HCDIZ Comparison July 2025
FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCDIZ has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $25.12, while HCDIZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.88, whereas HCDIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDIZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIZ's competition here