Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited FSUGY Peers
See (FSUGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUGY | $19.22 | -2.58% | 29.5B | 7.60 | $2.53 | +9.46% |
| BHPLF | $24.75 | +5.08% | 125.6B | 11.05 | $2.24 | +5.47% |
| RTPPF | $56.57 | -4.13% | 95.7B | 8.00 | $7.07 | +7.11% |
| RTNTF | $66.32 | +3.87% | 94.9B | 9.38 | $7.07 | +3.54% |
| GLNCY | $7.45 | -0.07% | 45.7B | -28.65 | -$0.26 | +2.89% |
| GMBXF | $5.75 | +3.98% | 44.8B | 11.98 | $0.48 | +3.23% |
| GLCNF | $3.75 | +0.13% | 44.5B | -28.81 | -$0.13 | +3.07% |
| AAUKF | $28.50 | N/A | 39.3B | -9.93 | -$2.87 | +2.55% |
| NGLOY | $14.34 | -1.31% | 30.6B | -9.96 | -$1.44 | +2.34% |
| FSUMF | $9.61 | -2.28% | 29.5B | 7.57 | $1.27 | +9.00% |
Stock Comparison
FSUGY vs BHPLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while BHPLF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs RTPPF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while RTPPF trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs RTNTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while RTNTF trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs GLNCY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while GLNCY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs GMBXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while GMBXF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs GLCNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while GLCNF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.81. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AAUKF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while AAUKF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NGLOY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while NGLOY trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FSUMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while FSUMF trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CMCLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while CMCLF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs TCKRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while TCKRF trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 670.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IPOAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while IPOAF trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IVPAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while IVPAF trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BOLIF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs JXMNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SHTLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while SHTLF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.71. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BDNNY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while BDNNY trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ABML Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs STMNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SMMYY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while SMMYY trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 56.55. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LYSDY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while LYSDY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 148.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LYSCF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while LYSCF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PUTKF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PUTKY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PUTKY trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NILSY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PAEKY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs JMXXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while JMXXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FLMMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CHZQ Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MALRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PILBF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PILBF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MALRY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MALRY trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NGXXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while NGXXF trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.24. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PTNDY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IPGDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while IPGDF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MIMTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IIDDY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NICMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AZZVF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs DWMNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while DWMNF trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AFBOF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SOUHY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while SOUHY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.19. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PTNDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ERMAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ERMAY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ERMAY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 88.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ADTLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ADTLF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BQSSF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while BQSSF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs DETRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while DETRF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LINRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while LINRF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -48.74. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ADMLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ADMLF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AZRMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AUSDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MFRVF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ILKAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ILKAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ILKAY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 988.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ILKAY trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FMCXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 974.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while FMCXF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -57.77. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ARDNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 950.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ARDNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ARDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs STTSY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ATUSF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 910.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ATUSF trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs TAOFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while TAOFF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ALMTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 772.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ALMTF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AFMJF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 758.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while AFMJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AMVMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 655.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while AMVMF trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -53.47. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CTJHF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NCKAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MJDLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 521.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MJDLF trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs VULNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while VULNF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FGOVF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while FGOVF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -93.18. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs TTNNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs OSTTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PXMFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MCRZF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MCHHF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BIRNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MNXMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 407.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MNXMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CGMLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs KMRPF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 387.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while KMRPF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs REEMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 382.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while REEMF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NQMIY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MLYF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CREQF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CTJHY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FWEDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while FWEDF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ERLFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ERLFF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MLXEF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 307.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MLXEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LTSRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ARAFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SLGGF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BSSMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SVMLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while SVMLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LRSRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs STQNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs EMOTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 244.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while EMOTF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MMILF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ERDCF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while ERDCF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -65.94. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PMETF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 240.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while PMETF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -49.45. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs RXRLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LTHHF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BSRUF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.22, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.60, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.