Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited (FSUGY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSUGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUGY | $24.09 | +0.63% | 37.7B | 9.69 | $2.53 | +7.37% |
| BHPLF | $27.99 | +3.10% | 125.6B | 11.05 | $2.24 | +5.01% |
| RTNTF | $71.00 | +0.00% | 104B | 11.85 | $6.28 | +3.16% |
| RTPPF | $59.96 | -0.48% | 103.9B | 9.69 | $6.28 | +6.60% |
| GMBXF | $6.38 | -2.89% | 51.8B | 13.32 | $0.50 | +3.62% |
| CYLYF | $0.00 | -99.99% | 49.7B | -0.79 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| GLNCY | $7.54 | +0.00% | 46.1B | -24.16 | -$0.32 | +2.78% |
| GLCNF | $3.80 | +1.33% | 45.9B | -24.15 | -$0.16 | +2.99% |
| FSUMF | $12.15 | +0.83% | 37.8B | 9.83 | $1.25 | +7.20% |
| AAUKF | $27.18 | -2.93% | 31.8B | -10.28 | -$2.87 | +2.27% |
Stock Comparison
FSUGY vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while BHPLF trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BHPLF's competition here
FSUGY vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while RTNTF trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check RTNTF's competition here
FSUGY vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while RTPPF trades at $59.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check RTPPF's competition here
FSUGY vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while GMBXF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check GMBXF's competition here
FSUGY vs CYLYF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CYLYF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while CYLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CYLYF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYLYF's ROE of -10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CYLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CYLYF's competition here
FSUGY vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while GLNCY trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -24.16. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check GLNCY's competition here
FSUGY vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while GLCNF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -24.15. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check GLCNF's competition here
FSUGY vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while FSUMF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FSUMF's competition here
FSUGY vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while AAUKF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AAUKF's competition here
FSUGY vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while NGLOY trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NGLOY's competition here
FSUGY vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while CMCLF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CMCLF's competition here
FSUGY vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while TCKRF trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 100.76. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check TCKRF's competition here
FSUGY vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while IPOAF trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IPOAF's competition here
FSUGY vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while IVPAF trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IVPAF's competition here
FSUGY vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BOLIF's competition here
FSUGY vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while BDNNY trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BDNNY's competition here
FSUGY vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check JXMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while SHTLF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SHTLF's competition here
FSUGY vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while LYSDY trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 209.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LYSDY's competition here
FSUGY vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while LYSCF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 277.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LYSCF's competition here
FSUGY vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while SMMYY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SMMYY's competition here
FSUGY vs ABML Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ABML's competition here
FSUGY vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check STMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PUTKY trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PUTKY's competition here
FSUGY vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PUTKF's competition here
FSUGY vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NILSY's competition here
FSUGY vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MALRY trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MALRY's competition here
FSUGY vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MALRF trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MALRF's competition here
FSUGY vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PAEKY's competition here
FSUGY vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PILBF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -126.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PILBF's competition here
FSUGY vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while NGXXF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -56.89. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NGXXF's competition here
FSUGY vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FLMMF's competition here
FSUGY vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IIDDY's competition here
FSUGY vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CHZQ's competition here
FSUGY vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IPGDF's competition here
FSUGY vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PTNDY's competition here
FSUGY vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MIMTF's competition here
FSUGY vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NICMF's competition here
FSUGY vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check DWMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AZZVF's competition here
FSUGY vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AFBOF's competition here
FSUGY vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ERMAF's competition here
FSUGY vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while SOUHY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.65. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SOUHY's competition here
FSUGY vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ILKAF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ILKAF's competition here
FSUGY vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ILKAY trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ILKAY's competition here
FSUGY vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ERMAY trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ERMAY's competition here
FSUGY vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PTNDF's competition here
FSUGY vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while DETRF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check DETRF's competition here
FSUGY vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check TAOFF's competition here
FSUGY vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ADTLF's competition here
FSUGY vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ADMLF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ADMLF's competition here
FSUGY vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while LINRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LINRF's competition here
FSUGY vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NCKAF's competition here
FSUGY vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AZRMF's competition here
FSUGY vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while FMCXF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FMCXF's competition here
FSUGY vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MFRVF's competition here
FSUGY vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ATUSF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ATUSF's competition here
FSUGY vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check STTSY's competition here
FSUGY vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 919.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while AMVMF trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 89.06. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AMVMF's competition here
FSUGY vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AUSDF's competition here
FSUGY vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 900.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AFMJF's competition here
FSUGY vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ALMTF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ALMTF's competition here
FSUGY vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 683.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while CREQF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CREQF's competition here
FSUGY vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 614.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while REEMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -39.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check REEMF's competition here
FSUGY vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CTJHF's competition here
FSUGY vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 558.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while VULNF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check VULNF's competition here
FSUGY vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 525.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while SLGGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SLGGF's competition here
FSUGY vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 523.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MJDLF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MJDLF's competition here
FSUGY vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 497.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while BQSSF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BQSSF's competition here
FSUGY vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while FGOVF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -93.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FGOVF's competition here
FSUGY vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check TTNNF's competition here
FSUGY vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PTTMF's competition here
FSUGY vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check OSTTF's competition here
FSUGY vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PMETF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -100.27. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PMETF's competition here
FSUGY vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MCRZF's competition here
FSUGY vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 454.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MNXMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.55. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MNXMF's competition here
FSUGY vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BIRNF's competition here
FSUGY vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 408.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while CGMLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CGMLF's competition here
FSUGY vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MLXEF's competition here
FSUGY vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NQMIY's competition here
FSUGY vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while KMRPF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check KMRPF's competition here
FSUGY vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MLYF's competition here
FSUGY vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 365.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while FWEDF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FWEDF's competition here
FSUGY vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CTJHY's competition here
FSUGY vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PXMFF's competition here
FSUGY vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -13.99. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ARAFF's competition here
FSUGY vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MCHHF's competition here
FSUGY vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while ERLFF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -31.08. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ERLFF's competition here
FSUGY vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 311.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while SVMLF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SVMLF's competition here
FSUGY vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BSSMF's competition here
FSUGY vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check RTLGF's competition here
FSUGY vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 301.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while SRHYY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SRHYY's competition here
FSUGY vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while PRMNF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -19.89. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PRMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs TLOFF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while TLOFF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check TLOFF's competition here
FSUGY vs MMILF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MMILF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MMILF's competition here
FSUGY vs LRSRF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LRSRF's competition here
FSUGY vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while MGMNF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MGMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs LTSRF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LTSRF's competition here
FSUGY vs STQNF Comparison August 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 37.7B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.09, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check STQNF's competition here