Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited FSUMF Peers
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $9.61 | -2.28% | 29.5B | 7.57 | $1.27 | +9.00% |
| BHPLF | $24.75 | +5.08% | 125.6B | 11.05 | $2.24 | +5.47% |
| RTPPF | $56.57 | -4.13% | 95.7B | 8.00 | $7.07 | +7.11% |
| RTNTF | $66.32 | +3.87% | 94.9B | 9.38 | $7.07 | +3.54% |
| GLNCY | $7.45 | -0.07% | 45.7B | -28.65 | -$0.26 | +2.89% |
| GMBXF | $5.75 | +3.98% | 44.8B | 11.98 | $0.48 | +3.23% |
| GLCNF | $3.75 | +0.13% | 44.5B | -28.81 | -$0.13 | +3.07% |
| AAUKF | $28.50 | N/A | 39.3B | -9.93 | -$2.87 | +2.55% |
| NGLOY | $14.34 | -1.31% | 30.6B | -9.96 | -$1.44 | +2.34% |
| FSUGY | $19.22 | -2.58% | 29.5B | 7.60 | $2.53 | +9.46% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while BHPLF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while RTPPF trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while RTNTF trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while GLNCY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while GMBXF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while GLCNF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while AAUKF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while NGLOY trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while FSUGY trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while CMCLF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while TCKRF trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 670.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while IPOAF trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while IVPAF trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs JXMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while SHTLF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while BDNNY trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while SMMYY trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 56.55. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while LYSDY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 148.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while LYSCF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PUTKY trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while JMXXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and JMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CHZQ Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PILBF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MALRY trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while NGXXF trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.24. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while IPGDF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while DWMNF trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while SOUHY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ERMAY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 88.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ADTLF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while BQSSF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while DETRF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while LINRF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -48.74. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ADMLF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ILKAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 988.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ILKAY trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 974.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while FMCXF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -57.77. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ARDNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 950.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ARDNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 910.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ATUSF trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while TAOFF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 772.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ALMTF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 758.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while AFMJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 655.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while AMVMF trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -53.47. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CTJHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NCKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 521.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MJDLF trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while VULNF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while FGOVF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -93.18. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PXMFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 407.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MNXMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs KMRPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 387.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while KMRPF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs REEMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 382.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while REEMF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MLYF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CREQF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CTJHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while FWEDF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ERLFF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 307.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MLXEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BSSMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs SVMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while SVMLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and SVMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs LRSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STQNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs EMOTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 244.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while EMOTF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MMILF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ERDCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while ERDCF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -65.94. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 240.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while PMETF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -49.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RXRLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs BSRUF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.61, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.