Fortive Corporation

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while APH trades at $110.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 43.35. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check APH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while TEL trades at $206.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 41.62. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TEL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while GLW trades at $65.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 69.63. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GLW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while GRMN trades at $235.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GRMN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check IIVI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BMNR trades at $60.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BMNR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while KEYS trades at $164.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KEYS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while TDY trades at $541.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TDY's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while JBL trades at $217.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check JBL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while CLS trades at $196.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 42.60. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CLS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while TRMB trades at $83.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 70.29. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TRMB's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while FLEX trades at $49.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FLEX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while COHR trades at $91.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -179.60. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check COHR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while FN trades at $322.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while CGNX trades at $43.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 59.31. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CGNX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MKSI trades at $104.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MKSI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SNDK trades at $46.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SNDK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SANM trades at $116.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SANM's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while LFUS trades at $256.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 58.15. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LFUS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while VNT trades at $43.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VNT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ITRI trades at $125.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ITRI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BMI trades at $191.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BMI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ESE trades at $188.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ESE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ST trades at $32.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 42.48. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ST's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while TTMI trades at $42.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 46.97. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TTMI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while NOVT trades at $118.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 68.03. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NOVT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OSIS trades at $233.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OSIS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while PLXS trades at $132.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PLXS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while VICR trades at $47.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VICR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OUST trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUST's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OUSTW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUSTW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUSTZ's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BELFB trades at $132.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BELFB's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BELFA trades at $113.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BELFA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BHE trades at $39.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BHE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ROG trades at $76.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -21.73. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ROG's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while PENG trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -81.97. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PENG's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while CTS trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CTS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FARO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 825.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while DAKT trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -80.05. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DAKT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 737.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ALNT trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ALNT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 643.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BKSY trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BKSY's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 633.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 578.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while LYTS trades at $19.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LYTS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AMOT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUST-WT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 386.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SATL trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SATL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while NEON trades at $21.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -59.84. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NEON's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MLAB trades at $67.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -529.77. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MLAB's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 363.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while VPG trades at $27.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is -303.89. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VPG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VPG's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 337.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MVIS trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MVIS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 320.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while KOPN trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -32.83. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KOPN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VLDR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 296.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SATLW trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SATLW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MEI trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MEI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while KULR trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KULR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check EMAN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while LPTH trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LPTH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while RELL trades at $9.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -118.62. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check RELL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MPTI trades at $41.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MPTI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while GNSS trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GNSS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while WRAP trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WRAP's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MIND trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MIND's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while LINK trades at $7.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -37.05. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LINK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ELTK trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ELTK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ODYS trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ODYS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while WBX trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WBX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while DSWL trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DSWL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OPTX trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 148.70. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OPTX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SOTK trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SOTK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while REFR trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -29.40. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check REFR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while CPSH trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -24.38. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPSH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CPSH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while LGL trades at $6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 86.81. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LGL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SELX trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SELX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ISNS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SVRE trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SVRE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while DAIO trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DAIO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while LUNA trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -25.67. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LUNA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while HOLOW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HOLOW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while NSYS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NSYS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TMPOW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while HOLO trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HOLO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MTEK trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MTEK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SGMA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VIAO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while FCUV trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FCUV's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while ELSE trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ELSE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNW's ROE of +873.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KNW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SLNH trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SLNH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SVREW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SVREW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SLNHP trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SLNHP's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while OST trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OST's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while WATT trades at $8.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WATT's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WATT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BNSO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MINDP's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while SOBR trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SOBR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MMAT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 16.3B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $47.80, while IMTE trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check IMTE's competition here