Formula One Group
Formula One Group FWONA Peers
See (FWONA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWONA | $89.77 | +1.08% | 31B | 1795.30 | $0.05 | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,241.48 | -0.72% | 528.3B | 58.59 | $21.19 | N/A |
| DIS | $113.89 | +1.21% | 204.7B | 23.24 | $4.90 | +0.83% |
| LYV | $144.08 | +0.03% | 33.4B | 48.84 | $2.95 | N/A |
| FWONK | $98.98 | +1.02% | 31.1B | 1649.67 | $0.06 | N/A |
| WBD | $9.82 | +1.71% | 24.3B | -2.23 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOXA | $54.37 | +0.98% | 23.4B | 13.46 | $4.04 | +1.00% |
| FOX | $49.79 | +0.98% | 23.3B | 12.38 | $4.02 | +1.00% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.68% |
| NWSA | $27.81 | -0.18% | 16.6B | 33.91 | $0.82 | +0.72% |
Stock Comparison
FWONA vs NFLX Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 528.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while NFLX trades at $1,241.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 58.59. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs DIS Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 204.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while DIS trades at $113.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LYV Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LYV trades at $144.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs FWONK Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while FWONK trades at $98.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 1649.67. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs WBD Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while WBD trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs FOXA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while FOXA trades at $54.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs FOX Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while FOX trades at $49.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs VIAC Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs NWSA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while NWSA trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs NWS Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while NWS trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs WMG Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while WMG trades at $26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs TKO Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while TKO trades at $165.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 84.24. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs ROKU Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while ROKU trades at $78.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -107.48. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs EDR Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs PARA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while PARA trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs PARAA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while PARAA trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs PARAP Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs WWE Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs SIRI Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while SIRI trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LLYVK Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LLYVK trades at $77.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 287.59. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LLYVA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LLYVA trades at $76.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 272.71. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs NXST Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while NXST trades at $169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs MSGS Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while MSGS trades at $191.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 910.52. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CNK Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CNK trades at $32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs MANU Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while MANU trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -15.09. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs BATRK Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while BATRK trades at $40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -123.85. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs BATRA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while BATRA trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -131.97. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs APE Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LGF-B Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LGF-A Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LION Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LION trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs MSGE Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while MSGE trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs BOWL Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs IQ Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while IQ trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 42.25. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs IMAX Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while IMAX trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 60.09. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs AMC Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while AMC trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs SPHR Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while SPHR trades at $37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs SBGI Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 916.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while SBGI trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs HUYA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 881.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while HUYA trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -56.93. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs PLAY Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 823.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while PLAY trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs MCS Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 540.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while MCS trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -43.10. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs RSVR Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 476.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while RSVR trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs AMCX Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while AMCX trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LIVX Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs AENT Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while AENT trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs AGAE Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while AGAE trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs GAIA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while GAIA trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -24.55. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs GNUS Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LVO Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LVO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs RSVRW Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while RSVRW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is more volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CNVS Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CNVS trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CIDM Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs RDI Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while RDI trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs RDIB Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while RDIB trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs NIPG Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while NIPG trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs TOON Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while TOON trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs ANGH Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while ANGH trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs ANGHW Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs ADD Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while ADD trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs MMV Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs DLPN Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while DLPN trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs KUKE Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while KUKE trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs BREA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while BREA trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CSCW Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CPOP Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CPOP trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs AENTW Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while AENTW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs HOFV Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while HOFV trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs BZFDW Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while BZFDW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is more volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CSSEN Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CSSEP Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CSSE Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs BLMZ Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while BLMZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs CSSEL Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs HOFVW Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs VIACP Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs DISCK Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs DISCB Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs RDBXW Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs AESE Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs LVOPP Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FWONA has daily volatility of 0.81 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.
FWONA vs ESGC Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs HMTV Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs RDBX Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs EMWP Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs MSGN Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.
FWONA vs VIACA Comparison
FWONA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONA stands at 31B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONA is priced at $89.77, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONA currently has a P/E ratio of 1795.30, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, FWONA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONA is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONA.