Formula One Group
Formula One Group (FWONK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FWONK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWONK | $98.94 | -1.41% | 31.8B | 1978.80 | $0.05 | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,158.60 | -0.07% | 492.3B | 49.47 | $23.42 | N/A |
| DIS | $116.59 | -2.12% | 209.6B | 23.79 | $4.90 | +0.86% |
| LYV | $146.14 | -1.06% | 33.9B | 49.55 | $2.95 | N/A |
| WBD | $12.87 | -2.28% | 31.9B | -2.93 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FWONA | $88.82 | -1.44% | 31.8B | 1480.33 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FOXA | $55.54 | -0.39% | 23.9B | 13.75 | $4.04 | +0.98% |
| FOX | $50.73 | -0.80% | 23.8B | 12.56 | $4.04 | +0.98% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.54% |
| NWSA | $29.09 | -0.78% | 17.3B | 35.48 | $0.82 | +0.69% |
Stock Comparison
FWONK vs NFLX Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 492.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while NFLX trades at $1,158.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 49.47. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check NFLX's competition here
FWONK vs DIS Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 209.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while DIS trades at $116.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check DIS's competition here
FWONK vs LYV Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LYV trades at $146.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 49.55. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LYV's competition here
FWONK vs WBD Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while WBD trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check WBD's competition here
FWONK vs FWONA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while FWONA trades at $88.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1480.33. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check FWONA's competition here
FWONK vs FOXA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while FOXA trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check FOXA's competition here
FWONK vs FOX Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while FOX trades at $50.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check FOX's competition here
FWONK vs VIAC Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VIAC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check VIAC's competition here
FWONK vs NWSA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while NWSA trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check NWSA's competition here
FWONK vs NWS Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while NWS trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check NWS's competition here
FWONK vs WMG Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while WMG trades at $28.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check WMG's competition here
FWONK vs TKO Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while TKO trades at $165.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 84.48. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check TKO's competition here
FWONK vs ROKU Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while ROKU trades at $79.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -109.56. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check ROKU's competition here
FWONK vs EDR Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check EDR's competition here
FWONK vs PARA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while PARA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PARA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check PARA's competition here
FWONK vs PARAA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while PARAA trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PARAA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check PARAA's competition here
FWONK vs PARAP Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PARAP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check PARAP's competition here
FWONK vs WWE Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check WWE's competition here
FWONK vs LLYVK Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LLYVK trades at $82.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 305.81. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LLYVK's competition here
FWONK vs LLYVA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LLYVA trades at $80.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 296.33. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LLYVA's competition here
FWONK vs SIRI Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while SIRI trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check SIRI's competition here
FWONK vs NXST Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while NXST trades at $184.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check NXST's competition here
FWONK vs MSGS Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while MSGS trades at $199.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 997.83. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check MSGS's competition here
FWONK vs MANU Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while MANU trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -33.81. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check MANU's competition here
FWONK vs CNK Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CNK trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CNK's competition here
FWONK vs BATRK Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while BATRK trades at $44.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -134.97. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check BATRK's competition here
FWONK vs BATRA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while BATRA trades at $46.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -141.36. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check BATRA's competition here
FWONK vs APE Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check APE's competition here
FWONK vs LGF-B Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LGF-B's competition here
FWONK vs LGF-A Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LGF-A's competition here
FWONK vs IQ Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while IQ trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check IQ's competition here
FWONK vs BOWL Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check BOWL's competition here
FWONK vs MSGE Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while MSGE trades at $36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check MSGE's competition here
FWONK vs LION Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LION trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LION's competition here
FWONK vs SPHR Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while SPHR trades at $40.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check SPHR's competition here
FWONK vs IMAX Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while IMAX trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check IMAX's competition here
FWONK vs AMC Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while AMC trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check AMC's competition here
FWONK vs SBGI Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 981M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while SBGI trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check SBGI's competition here
FWONK vs PLAY Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 971.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while PLAY trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check PLAY's competition here
FWONK vs HUYA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 767.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while HUYA trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -49.07. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check HUYA's competition here
FWONK vs RSVR Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 504.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while RSVR trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check RSVR's competition here
FWONK vs MCS Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 455.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while MCS trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -36.30. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check MCS's competition here
FWONK vs LIVX Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LIVX's competition here
FWONK vs AMCX Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 252.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while AMCX trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check AMCX's competition here
FWONK vs AENT Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while AENT trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check AENT's competition here
FWONK vs GNUS Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check GNUS's competition here
FWONK vs GAIA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while GAIA trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check GAIA's competition here
FWONK vs CNVS Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CNVS trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNVS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CNVS's competition here
FWONK vs RSVRW Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while RSVRW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check RSVRW's competition here
FWONK vs LVO Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LVO trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LVO's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check LVO's competition here
FWONK vs AGAE Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while AGAE trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check AGAE's competition here
FWONK vs CIDM Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CIDM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CIDM's competition here
FWONK vs NIPG Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while NIPG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check NIPG's competition here
FWONK vs RDI Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while RDI trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check RDI's competition here
FWONK vs RDIB Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while RDIB trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check RDIB's competition here
FWONK vs TOON Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while TOON trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check TOON's competition here
FWONK vs ANGHW Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check ANGHW's competition here
FWONK vs ADD Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while ADD trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check ADD's competition here
FWONK vs ANGH Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while ANGH trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check ANGH's competition here
FWONK vs CPOP Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CPOP trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CPOP's competition here
FWONK vs MMV Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check MMV's competition here
FWONK vs BREA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while BREA trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BREA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check BREA's competition here
FWONK vs DLPN Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while DLPN trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check DLPN's competition here
FWONK vs AENTW Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while AENTW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check AENTW's competition here
FWONK vs CSCW Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CSCW's competition here
FWONK vs KUKE Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while KUKE trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check KUKE's competition here
FWONK vs HOFV Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while HOFV trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check HOFV's competition here
FWONK vs BZFDW Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while BZFDW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check BZFDW's competition here
FWONK vs CSSEP Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CSSEP's competition here
FWONK vs CSSE Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CSSE's competition here
FWONK vs CSSEL Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CSSEL's competition here
FWONK vs CSSEN Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check CSSEN's competition here
FWONK vs BLMZ Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while BLMZ trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check BLMZ's competition here
FWONK vs HOFVW Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check HOFVW's competition here
FWONK vs VIACA Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VIACA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check VIACA's competition here
FWONK vs RDBX Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check RDBX's competition here
FWONK vs LVOPP Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FWONK has daily volatility of 2.94 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.Check LVOPP's competition here
FWONK vs RDBXW Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check RDBXW's competition here
FWONK vs DISCB Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check DISCB's competition here
FWONK vs MSGN Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check MSGN's competition here
FWONK vs ESGC Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check ESGC's competition here
FWONK vs DISCK Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check DISCK's competition here
FWONK vs EMWP Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check EMWP's competition here
FWONK vs AESE Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check AESE's competition here
FWONK vs VIACP Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VIACP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check VIACP's competition here
FWONK vs HMTV Comparison August 2025
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 31.8B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $98.94, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 1978.80, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.Check HMTV's competition here