GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.
GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG | $2.34 | +1.74% | 236.6M | 15.53 | $0.15 | +3.83% |
| MAR | $279.11 | +2.28% | 76.4B | 31.79 | $8.78 | +0.92% |
| HLT | $273.65 | +2.27% | 64.4B | 42.11 | $6.50 | +0.22% |
| IHG | $118.29 | +1.06% | 18.2B | 30.65 | $3.86 | +2.38% |
| H | $148.82 | +2.28% | 14.2B | 18.75 | $7.92 | +0.40% |
| HTHT | $33.29 | -1.96% | 10.2B | 23.12 | $1.44 | +4.82% |
| WH | $92.00 | +3.58% | 7.1B | 21.65 | $4.25 | +1.72% |
| CHH | $135.29 | +1.71% | 6.3B | 20.74 | $6.52 | +0.85% |
| ATAT | $35.69 | +0.03% | 4.9B | 28.31 | $1.26 | +3.61% |
| MCG | $6.58 | -0.60% | 1.3B | -6.21 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GHG vs MAR Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while MAR trades at $279.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MAR's competition here
GHG vs HLT Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while HLT trades at $273.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HLT's competition here
GHG vs IHG Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while IHG trades at $118.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check IHG's competition here
GHG vs H Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, H has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while H trades at $148.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas H's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to H's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check H's competition here
GHG vs HTHT Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while HTHT trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HTHT's competition here
GHG vs WH Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while WH trades at $92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check WH's competition here
GHG vs CHH Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while CHH trades at $135.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHH's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check CHH's competition here
GHG vs ATAT Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while ATAT trades at $35.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check ATAT's competition here
GHG vs MCG Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MCG's competition here
GHG vs SHCO Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while SHCO trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SHCO's competition here
GHG vs SONDW Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while SONDW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SONDW's competition here
GHG vs SOND Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while SOND trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SOND's competition here
GHG vs INTG Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while INTG trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check INTG's competition here
GHG vs LUXH Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 81.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while LUXH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXH's competition here
GHG vs LUXHP Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 19.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXHP's competition here
GHG vs STAY Comparison July 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 236.6M. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.34, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 15.53, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check STAY's competition here