Glencore plc

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while BHPLF trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while RTPPF trades at $56.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while RTNTF trades at $66.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while GMBXF trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while GLCNF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.81. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while AAUKF trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while NGLOY trades at $14.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while FSUMF trades at $9.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while FSUGY trades at $19.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while CMCLF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while TCKRF trades at $33.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 670.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while IPOAF trades at $25.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while IVPAF trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while SHTLF trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.71. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while BDNNY trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ABML trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while STMNF trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while SMMYY trades at $5.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 56.55. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while LYSDY trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 148.25. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while LYSCF trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PUTKY trades at $26.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while NILSY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while JMXXF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MALRF trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PILBF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MALRY trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while NGXXF trades at $11.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.24. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while IPGDF trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while NICMF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while DWMNF trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while SOUHY trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.19. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ERMAY trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 88.33. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ADTLF trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while BQSSF trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while DETRF trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while LINRF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -48.74. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ADMLF trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ILKAF trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 988.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ILKAY trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 974.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while FMCXF trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -57.77. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 950.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ARDNF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ARDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while STTSY trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 910.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ATUSF trades at $19.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while TAOFF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 772.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ALMTF trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 758.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while AFMJF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 655.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while AMVMF trades at $20.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -53.47. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 521.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MJDLF trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while VULNF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while FGOVF trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -93.18. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 407.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MNXMF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 387.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while KMRPF trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 382.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while REEMF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MLYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while CREQF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while FWEDF trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ERLFF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 307.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MLXEF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while SVMLF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while STQNF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 244.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while EMOTF trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while MMILF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while ERDCF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -65.94. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 240.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while PMETF trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -49.45. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 45.7B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.45, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.65, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.