Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A.

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while DAL trades at $54.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check DAL's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while UAL trades at $91.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check UAL's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while LUV trades at $33.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check LUV's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while CEA trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check CEA's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while JOBY-WT trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check JOBY-WT's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while JOBY trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check JOBY's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while RYAAY trades at $63.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check RYAAY's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while LTM trades at $41.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check LTM's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while PAC trades at $223.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check PAC's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ASR trades at $303.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ASR's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while AAL trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check AAL's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ALK trades at $52.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ALK's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while OMAB trades at $107.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check OMAB's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while SKYW trades at $112.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check SKYW's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while CPA trades at $110.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check CPA's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while PBI-PB trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check PBI-PB's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while CAAP trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check CAAP's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while AAWW trades at $102.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check AAWW's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while JBLU trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check JBLU's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ATSG trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ATSG's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while UP trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check UP's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ULCC trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ULCC's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while HA trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HA's ROE of +18.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check HA's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 924.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ALGT trades at $50.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ALGT's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while SNCY trades at $11.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check SNCY's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while VLRS trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check VLRS's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 349.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while BLDEW trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check BLDEW's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while BLDE trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -13.03. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check BLDE's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ASLE trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -57.27. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ASLE's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 194.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while SRFM trades at $5.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check SRFM's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 190.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while FLYX trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check FLYX's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while AZUL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check AZUL's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while MATH trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check MATH's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while SAVE trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check SAVE's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while FLYY trades at $4.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check FLYY's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while MESA trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check MESA's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while SOAR trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check SOAR's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check FLYX-WT's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ASLEW's competition here

GOL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOL stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOL is priced at $2.72, while ZNH trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOL currently has a P/E ratio of 1.62, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOL's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GOL is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOL.Check ZNH's competition here