Hecla Mining Company
Hecla Mining Company HL Peers
See (HL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HL | $6.00 | +2.92% | 3.8B | 49.92 | $0.12 | +0.59% |
| NEM | $59.19 | +1.95% | 65.9B | 13.49 | $4.39 | +1.70% |
| AEM | $123.05 | +2.73% | 62.2B | 26.19 | $4.70 | +1.31% |
| WPM | $90.25 | +1.06% | 41B | 66.38 | $1.36 | +0.53% |
| GOLD | $21.20 | +1.58% | 36.4B | 17.34 | $1.22 | +1.89% |
| FNV | $164.72 | +0.81% | 31.8B | 51.51 | $3.20 | +0.90% |
| AU | $46.36 | -0.19% | 23.3B | 21.26 | $2.18 | +0.27% |
| GFI | $23.82 | -0.79% | 21.3B | 17.26 | $1.38 | +2.30% |
| KGC | $15.85 | +3.53% | 19.4B | 16.17 | $0.98 | +0.76% |
| RGLD | $179.96 | +1.86% | 11.8B | 29.79 | $6.04 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
HL vs NEM Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while NEM trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs AEM Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while AEM trades at $123.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs WPM Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while WPM trades at $90.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 66.38. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GOLD Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GOLD trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs FNV Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while FNV trades at $164.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 51.51. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs AU Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while AU trades at $46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GFI Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GFI trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs KGC Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while KGC trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs RGLD Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while RGLD trades at $179.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs AGI Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while AGI trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs HMY Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while HMY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs CDE Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while CDE trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs AUY Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs SBSW Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while SBSW trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -13.01. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs BTG Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while BTG trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs OR Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while OR trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 151.29. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs IAG Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while IAG trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs EGO Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while EGO trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs NGD Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while NGD trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs HL-PB Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while HL-PB trades at $50.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1699.67. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs ORLA Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while ORLA trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs SAND Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while SAND trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 93.15. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs EQX Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while EQX trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs SSRM Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while SSRM trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs NG Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while NG trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs CGAU Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while CGAU trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 40.64. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs SA Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while SA trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -133.18. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs ARMN Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while ARMN trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs DRD Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while DRD trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs CNL Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 913.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while CNL trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs IAUX Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 510.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while IAUX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GSS Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs DC Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 429.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while DC trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs CMCL Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while CMCL trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GAU Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 332.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GAU trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs ODV Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 300M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while ODV trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs NFGC Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while NFGC trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs CTGO Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 261.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while CTGO trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs DC-WT Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while DC-WT trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs IDR Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while IDR trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs THM Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while THM trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -44.75. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs USAU Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while USAU trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GSV Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GLDG Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GLDG trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs HYMCL Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs VGZ Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while VGZ trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs HYMC Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while HYMC trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs TRX Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while TRX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GORO Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GORO trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs NVAWW Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while NVAWW trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs PZG Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while PZG trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs ODVWZ Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while ODVWZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs AAU Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs AUST Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while AUST trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs HYMCW Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs HYMCZ Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs KL Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs GPL Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.
HL vs PVG Comparison
HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $6.00, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.92, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.