MicroCloud Hologram Inc.
MicroCloud Hologram Inc. HOLO Peers
See (HOLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLO | $4.67 | -10.19% | 22.1M | -0.17 | -$27.93 | N/A |
| APH | $93.36 | +0.90% | 112.9B | 45.32 | $2.06 | +0.65% |
| TEL | $164.68 | +1.45% | 48.8B | 35.80 | $4.60 | +1.62% |
| GLW | $50.70 | -0.32% | 43.4B | 97.49 | $0.52 | +2.20% |
| GRMN | $207.28 | +0.88% | 39.9B | 27.35 | $7.58 | +1.44% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $161.94 | +1.32% | 27.9B | 38.10 | $4.25 | N/A |
| FTV | $73.02 | +1.76% | 24.8B | 32.03 | $2.28 | +0.44% |
| TDY | $500.68 | +0.13% | 23.5B | 28.68 | $17.46 | N/A |
| JBL | $176.61 | +2.30% | 19B | 39.78 | $4.44 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
HOLO vs APH Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 112.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while APH trades at $93.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 45.32. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs TEL Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while TEL trades at $164.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs GLW Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while GLW trades at $50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 97.49. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs GRMN Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while GRMN trades at $207.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs IIVI Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs KEYS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while KEYS trades at $161.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs FTV Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while FTV trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs TDY Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while TDY trades at $500.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs JBL Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while JBL trades at $176.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs TRMB Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while TRMB trades at $72.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs FLEX Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while FLEX trades at $43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs CLS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while CLS trades at $120.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs COHR Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while COHR trades at $79.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -362.41. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs FN Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while FN trades at $234.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs BMI Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while BMI trades at $246.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 54.22. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MKSI Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MKSI trades at $88.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SNDK Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SNDK trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ITRI Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ITRI trades at $120.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs LFUS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while LFUS trades at $217.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs VNT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while VNT trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs CGNX Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while CGNX trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 43.88. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ESE Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ESE trades at $184.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SANM Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SANM trades at $87.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs NOVT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while NOVT trades at $127.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 65.34. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ST Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ST trades at $27.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OSIS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OSIS trades at $226.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs PLXS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while PLXS trades at $132.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs TTMI Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while TTMI trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 44.29. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs VICR Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while VICR trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 85.40. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs BHE Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while BHE trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs CTS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while CTS trades at $41.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ROG Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ROG trades at $66.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 74.27. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs PENG Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while PENG trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs BELFB Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 954.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while BELFB trades at $76.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs BELFA Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 927.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while BELFA trades at $66.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs FARO Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 815.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while FARO trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1060.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OUST Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 784.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OUST trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OUST-WTA Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs DAKT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 696.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while DAKT trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 349.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OST Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 636M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OST trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MLAB Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 567.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MLAB trades at $103.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -288.86. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs AMOT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ALNT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ALNT trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs LYTS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 487.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while LYTS trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OUST-WT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs BKSY-WT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 416.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs BKSY Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 408.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while BKSY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SATLW Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 389.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SATLW trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs VPG Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while VPG trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 121.65. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SATL Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SATL trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs KULR Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while KULR trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs VLDR Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MEI Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 292.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MEI trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MVIS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 284.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MVIS trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs KOPN Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 239.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while KOPN trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs EMAN Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs NEON Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while NEON trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MPTI Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MPTI trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs RELL Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while RELL trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -62.07. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs LPTH Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 128.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while LPTH trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs WBX Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while WBX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ODYS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 84.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ODYS trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs GNSS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while GNSS trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs WRAP Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while WRAP trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ELTK Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ELTK trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs REFR Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while REFR trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs LINK Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while LINK trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -24.95. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SOTK Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SOTK trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MIND Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MIND trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OPTX Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OPTX trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SELX Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SELX trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs CPSH Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while CPSH trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs DSWL Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while DSWL trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs LGL Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while LGL trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 84.25. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ISNS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs FCUV Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while FCUV trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs DAIO Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while DAIO trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs NSYS Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while NSYS trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs TMPOW Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs LUNA Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while LUNA trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MTEK Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MTEK trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SVRE Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SVRE trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SGMA Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SGMA trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs VIAO Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs ELSE Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while ELSE trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs WATT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SLNH Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SLNH trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SLNHP Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SLNHP trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SVREW Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs SOBR Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while SOBR trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs BNSO Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MINDP Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OUSTZ Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs IMTE Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while IMTE trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MMAT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OPTXW Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OPTXW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs MTEKW Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while MTEKW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs LGL-WT Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while LGL-WT trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.
HOLO vs OUSTW Comparison
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $4.67, while OUSTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.