Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.
Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. (IBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | N/A |
| ADM | $53.85 | -0.60% | 25.9B | 18.97 | $2.84 | +3.75% |
| TSN | $52.53 | +0.44% | 18.3B | 20.44 | $2.57 | +3.79% |
| BG | $78.00 | -2.21% | 15.6B | 7.86 | $9.92 | +3.52% |
| SFD | $24.32 | +0.83% | 9.6B | 10.71 | $2.27 | +2.07% |
| CALM | $107.88 | -2.93% | 5.2B | 4.32 | $24.96 | +6.23% |
| AGRO | $8.81 | -4.13% | 4.4B | 14.00 | $0.63 | +3.94% |
| FDP | $37.29 | -0.80% | 1.8B | 11.95 | $3.12 | +2.95% |
| VITL | $35.27 | -5.19% | 1.6B | 31.49 | $1.12 | N/A |
| DOLE | $14.04 | -1.40% | 1.3B | 11.42 | $1.23 | +2.31% |
Stock Comparison
IBA vs ADM Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while ADM trades at $53.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check ADM's competition here
IBA vs TSN Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while TSN trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check TSN's competition here
IBA vs BG Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while BG trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check BG's competition here
IBA vs SFD Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while SFD trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check SFD's competition here
IBA vs CALM Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CALM trades at $107.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check CALM's competition here
IBA vs AGRO Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGRO trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AGRO's competition here
IBA vs FDP Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while FDP trades at $37.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check FDP's competition here
IBA vs VITL Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while VITL trades at $35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check VITL's competition here
IBA vs DOLE Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while DOLE trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check DOLE's competition here
IBA vs LND Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while LND trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check LND's competition here
IBA vs CHSCP Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCP trades at $28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check CHSCP's competition here
IBA vs CHSCO Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCO trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check CHSCO's competition here
IBA vs CHSCM Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 346.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCM trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check CHSCM's competition here
IBA vs CHSCL Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 346.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCL trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check CHSCL's competition here
IBA vs CHSCN Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCN trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check CHSCN's competition here
IBA vs LMNR Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while LMNR trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -113.62. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check LMNR's competition here
IBA vs ALCO Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while ALCO trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check ALCO's competition here
IBA vs AFRI Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 207.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AFRI trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AFRI's competition here
IBA vs VFF Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while VFF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check VFF's competition here
IBA vs AGFS Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AGFS's competition here
IBA vs LOCL Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while LOCL trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check LOCL's competition here
IBA vs PME Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check PME's competition here
IBA vs DTCK Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while DTCK trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTCK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check DTCK's competition here
IBA vs AFRIW Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AFRIW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -19.57. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AFRIW's competition here
IBA vs APPHW Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check APPHW's competition here
IBA vs APPH Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check APPH's competition here
IBA vs SDOT Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while SDOT trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check SDOT's competition here
IBA vs EDBLW Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while EDBLW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check EDBLW's competition here
IBA vs EDBL Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while EDBL trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check EDBL's competition here
IBA vs AGRI Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGRI trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AGRI's competition here
IBA vs AQB Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AQB trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AQB's competition here
IBA vs KAL Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check KAL's competition here
IBA vs KALWW Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check KALWW's competition here
IBA vs SANW Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while SANW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check SANW's competition here
IBA vs AAGR Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 289.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AAGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AAGR's competition here
IBA vs AGRIW Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AGRIW's competition here
IBA vs AAGRW Comparison August 2025
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 57.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.Check AAGRW's competition here