Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.
Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (IMH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IMH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMH | $0.22 | +2.23% | 8.2M | -0.14 | -$1.59 | N/A |
| RKT | $15.00 | +0.94% | 31.5B | -499.83 | -$0.03 | +5.35% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| COOP | $157.13 | +0.48% | 10.1B | 17.64 | $8.91 | N/A |
| UWMC | $4.27 | -2.51% | 5.3B | -53.25 | -$0.08 | +9.43% |
| UWMC-WT | $0.08 | -11.11% | 4.9B | N/A | N/A | +9.43% |
| PFSI | $94.07 | +0.87% | 4.9B | 14.43 | $6.52 | +1.28% |
| WD | $76.39 | +0.61% | 2.6B | 26.18 | $2.92 | +3.47% |
| GHLD | $19.85 | -0.05% | 1.2B | 27.96 | $0.71 | +2.52% |
| ECPG | $38.61 | -0.43% | 900.6M | -7.95 | -$4.85 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IMH vs RKT Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while RKT trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is -499.83. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check RKT's competition here
IMH vs MMAC Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check MMAC's competition here
IMH vs COOP Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while COOP trades at $157.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check COOP's competition here
IMH vs UWMC Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while UWMC trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is -53.25. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check UWMC's competition here
IMH vs UWMC-WT Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
IMH vs PFSI Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while PFSI trades at $94.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check PFSI's competition here
IMH vs WD Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while WD trades at $76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check WD's competition here
IMH vs GHLD Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while GHLD trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check GHLD's competition here
IMH vs ECPG Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 900.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while ECPG trades at $38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to ECPG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check ECPG's competition here
IMH vs VEL Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 637.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while VEL trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check VEL's competition here
IMH vs LDI Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 583.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while LDI trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check LDI's competition here
IMH vs ATAX Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check ATAX's competition here
IMH vs HMPT Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check HMPT's competition here
IMH vs ONIT Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 308.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while ONIT trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check ONIT's competition here
IMH vs GHI Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while GHI trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check GHI's competition here
IMH vs BETRW Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 220.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while BETRW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to BETRW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check BETRW's competition here
IMH vs BETR Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while BETR trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to BETR's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check BETR's competition here
IMH vs SNFCA Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 209.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while SNFCA trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check SNFCA's competition here
IMH vs OCN Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check OCN's competition here
IMH vs IOR Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while IOR trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check IOR's competition here
IMH vs PAPL Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while PAPL trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check PAPL's competition here
IMH vs CNF Comparison July 2025
IMH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMH stands at 8.2M. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMH is priced at $0.22, while CNF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, IMH's ROE is +47.31%, compared to CNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMH is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMH.Check CNF's competition here