Samsara Inc.
Samsara Inc. IOT Peers
See (IOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOT | $38.12 | -1.27% | 21.7B | -173.32 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| MSFT | $510.88 | +0.99% | 3.8T | 39.52 | $12.93 | +0.63% |
| ORCL | $242.83 | +0.38% | 681.9B | 56.06 | $4.33 | +0.74% |
| PLTR | $154.86 | +0.15% | 350.4B | 703.91 | $0.22 | N/A |
| ADBE | $371.69 | -0.21% | 157.7B | 23.80 | $15.62 | N/A |
| PANW | $201.16 | +0.97% | 134.1B | 116.28 | $1.73 | N/A |
| CRWD | $462.03 | +0.11% | 115.2B | -650.86 | -$0.71 | N/A |
| SNPS | $609.68 | -0.77% | 112.8B | 70.40 | $8.66 | N/A |
| HOOD | $101.93 | -0.15% | 89.9B | 58.23 | $1.75 | N/A |
| FTNT | $104.77 | -0.28% | 80.2B | 43.12 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IOT vs MSFT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while MSFT trades at $510.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ORCL Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 681.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ORCL trades at $242.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 56.06. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PLTR Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 350.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PLTR trades at $154.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 703.91. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ADBE Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ADBE trades at $371.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PANW Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 134.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PANW trades at $201.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 116.28. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CRWD Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CRWD trades at $462.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -650.86. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SNPS Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SNPS trades at $609.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 70.40. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs HOOD Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 89.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while HOOD trades at $101.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 58.23. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs FTNT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while FTNT trades at $104.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.12. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs NET Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while NET trades at $191.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -766.20. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs VMW Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CRWV Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CRWV trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -47.43. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SQ Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs XYZ Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while XYZ trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ZS Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ZS trades at $284.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1093.46. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs NETE Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs TOST Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while TOST trades at $48.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 178.00. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs VRSN Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while VRSN trades at $286.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SPLK Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CHKP Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CHKP trades at $222.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs GDDY Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while GDDY trades at $166.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CPAY Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CPAY trades at $333.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs FLT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs AFRM Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while AFRM trades at $65.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -346.42. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs NTNX Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while NTNX trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -284.62. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs MDB Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while MDB trades at $235.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -213.78. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs GEN Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while GEN trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CYBR Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CYBR trades at $375.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -185.81. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs FFIV Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while FFIV trades at $301.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs RBRK Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while RBRK trades at $85.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs OKTA Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while OKTA trades at $97.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 150.60. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs KSPI Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while KSPI trades at $85.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs NLOK Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs AKAM Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while AKAM trades at $80.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SAIL Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SAIL trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs DOX Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while DOX trades at $88.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ALTR Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PLAN Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs FOUR Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while FOUR trades at $104.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CFLT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CFLT trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs KVYO Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while KVYO trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -192.47. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs INFA Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while INFA trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 819.50. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs WIX Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while WIX trades at $152.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 60.46. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs DBX Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while DBX trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs HCP Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs JCOM Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PATH Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PATH trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -102.67. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CCCS Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CCCS trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 988.00. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SQSP Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs S Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while S trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas S's P/E ratio is -14.74. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs NEWR Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs VRNS Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while VRNS trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -65.90. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs WEX Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while WEX trades at $174.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SPSC Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SPSC trades at $137.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 64.09. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs QLYS Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while QLYS trades at $139.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs NVEI Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs BOX Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while BOX trades at $33.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ACIW Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ACIW trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs EEFT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while EEFT trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CORZZ Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CORZZ trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CORZ Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CORZ trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs TENB Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while TENB trades at $33.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -87.03. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs AVPT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while AVPT trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -142.31. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ESMT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ODD Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ODD trades at $69.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs STNE Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while STNE trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -16.89. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs RELY Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while RELY trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -572.00. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CLBT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CLBT trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SWI Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs DLO Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while DLO trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs EVOP Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs WRD Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while WRD trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PGYWW Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PGYWW trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs MQ Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while MQ trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PAGS Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PAGS trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs DOCN Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while DOCN trades at $28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PGY Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PGY trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs PAYO Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while PAYO trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs BB Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while BB trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 197.74. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs APPN Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while APPN trades at $29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -35.57. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs FIVN Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while FIVN trades at $28.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -477.00. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs RAMP Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while RAMP trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -815.25. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CORZW Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CORZW trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs EVTC Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while EVTC trades at $33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs EVCM Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while EVCM trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -95.21. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs GETVV Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs TDC Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while TDC trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs AVDX Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while AVDX trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.50. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs FORG Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs GSKY Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs CSGS Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while CSGS trades at $63.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs GET Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs STER Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs NTCT Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while NTCT trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs TUYA Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while TUYA trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs ZUO Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs SUMO Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs GB Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while GB trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.
IOT vs RPD Comparison
IOT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IOT stands at 21.7B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IOT is priced at $38.12, while RPD trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IOT currently has a P/E ratio of -173.32, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, IOT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IOT is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IOT.